OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsand
LandManagementPractices
U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency
OfficeofSolidWasteandEmergencyResponse
September2009
inanyfuturerevisionsofthisdocument.
TableofContents
ExecutiveSummary 1
Introduction 1
UnderstandingU.S.GHGEmissions 2
LookingForward 5
Section1Introduction 6
Section2 UnderstandingU.S.GHGEmissions 10
Sector‐BasedViewofU.S.GHGEmissions 10
Systems‐BasedViewofU.S.GHGEmissions 11
MaterialsManagement 12
LandManagement 13
Other 16
Summary 18
Section3 PotentialGHGReductionsThroughMaterialsandLandManagement 19
ReducingGHGEmissionsthroughMaterialsManagementPractices 19
PotentialGHGEmissionsReductionsfromMaterialsManagement 22
ReducingorAvoidingGHGEmissionsthroughLandManagementPractices 23
PotentialGHGEmissionsReducedorAvoidedfromLandManagement 26
Section4LookingForward 28
AppendixA
TechnicalSupportforOpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterials
andLandManagementPractices A‐1
referredtoastotaltechnicalpotentialscenarios—asafirststeptoidentifyingareasofopportunityfor
EPAanditspartnerstoreduceGHGemissionsthroughmaterialsandlandmanagement.
Introduction
OSWERanditspartnersimplementenvironmentalprogramsthatarebroadlycategorizedintothree
areas:materialsmanagementthroughresourceconservationandrecovery;landmanagementthrough
preventionofcontaminantreleasesandcleanupandreuseofcontaminatedsites;andemergency
responseandpreparedness.Thesethreeprogramareasallhavedirectimpactsoncommunitiesacross
theUnitedStates.Materialsmanagementreferstohowwemanagematerialresourcesastheyflow
throughtheeconomy,fromextractionorharvestofmaterialsandfood(e.g.,mining,forestry,and
agriculture),productionandtransportofgoods,provisionofservices,reuseofmaterials,and,if
necessary,disposal.EPApromotesmaterialsmanagementapproachesthatservehumanneedsby
usingandreusingresourcesproductivelyandsustainablythroughouttheirlifecycles,minimizingboth
theamountofmaterialsinvolvedandtheassociatedenvironmentalimpacts.Landmanagementrefers
tohowwemanageanduselandtoprovideopenspaceandhabitat,food,naturalresources,and
placesforpeopletolive,work,andrecreate.EPApromotesintegratedlandmanagementstrategies
thatuselandasproductivelyandsustainablyaspossiblebypreventingandminimizingtheoccurrence
ofcontaminationandcleaningup,reusing,andrestoringcontaminatedlandforbeneficialreuse.EPA’s
emergencyresponseandpreparednessprogramswillhaveakeyroleinadaptingtotheenvironmental
changesspurredbyclimatechange.
Howwemanageourmaterialsandland—twoofOSWER’sthreecoreprogramareas—hasasignificant
impactonU.S.GHGemissionsandsinks.Strategiesforreducingemissionsthroughmaterialsandland
managementalsohavesubstantialenvironmentalandeconomicco‐benefitsforcommunities.
1
IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.FourthAssessmentReport(AR4).p.30.Availableat: />report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf
2
ProposedEndangermentandCauseorContributeFindingsforGreenhouseGasesUnderSection202(a)oftheCleanAirAct.ProposedRule.74Fed.
Reg.18886‐18910.April24,2009.
theGHGemissionsassociatedwithmaterialsandlandmanagement,asshowninFigureES‐1.Appendix
Aprovidesthemethodologyusedforthisanalysis,includingkeyassumptionsandreferencesfor
sourcedata.
Combined,materialsmanagementisassociatedwithanestimated42%oftotalU.S.GHGemissions
andlandmanagementisassociatedwithanestimated16%oftotalU.S.GHGemissions.Basedona
preliminaryestimateprovidedinthisreport,GHGemissionsfromgreenfielddevelopmentare
equivalenttoapproximatelyanadditional4%oftotalU.S.emissions.
4
Theland‐basedcarbonsink
reportedintheInventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinkshasbeenincludedinthisfigure
tohelpconveytheeffectlandmanagementhasonU.S.emissionsandsinks.Theland‐basedcarbon
sinkisequivalentto13%of2006U.S.GHGemissions.
5
FigureES‐1showstherelativemagnitudeoftheemissionsassociatedwithmaterialsandland
management.ByallocatingtheemissionsreportedintheInventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissions
3
U.S.EPA.2008.InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2006.Availableat:
/>version,InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2007,waspublishedin2009andcanbefoundat
eport.html.
4
EmissionsfromgreenfielddevelopmentarenotcalculatedintheU.S.Inventory,butthisestimatemayoverlapwithexistinglandsinkvalue.
5
U.S.EPA.2008.InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2006.p.ES‐14.Availableat:
/>
2
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
• In2006,waste‐to‐energyrecoverysystemscombustedMSWandresultedintheavoidanceof17
MMTCO
2
EinGHGemissions.
8
• In2005,EPA’sWasteWisepartnersreportedsourcereductionandrecyclingactivitiesthat
resultedintheavoidanceof27MMTCO
2
EinGHGemissions.
9
6
ThefollowingtoolswereusedtocalculatetheselectedexamplesofGHGemissionsreductions,inadditiontothedatasourcesreferencedforeach
examplebelow:U.S.EPA.March2009.GreenhouseGasEquivalenciesCalculator;U.S.EPA.September2008.WAsteReductionModel(WARM);and
Fogt,Robert.2008.OnlineConversionToolforEnergy.
7
U.S.EPA,OfficeofSolidWasteandEmergencyResponse.November2007.MunicipalSolidWasteGeneration, Recycling,andDisposalintheUnited
States:FactsandFiguresfor 2006,p.1‐8.
8
Ibid.
9
U.S.EPA.October2006.WasteWise2006AnnualReport .p.1.Availableat: />
3
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
TohelpillustratethepotentialforGHGreductionandavoidanceopportunitiesfrommaterialsandland
managementpractices,thisanalysisincludesseveral“totaltechnicalpotential”scenarios.BoxES‐1
25% 20—50
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Reduce use of non-packaging paper products by:
10
50% 20—70
MMTCO
2
E/yr
25% 10—35
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Extend the life of personal computers by:
50% 25
MMTCO
2
E/yr
25% 15
MMTCO
50% 70—80
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Increase composting of food scraps from 2006 rate (2%) to:
100% 20
MMTCO
2
E/yr
50% 10
MMTCO
2
E/yr
25% 5
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Energy Recovery / Disposal
Combust percentage of currently landfilled MSW:
100% 70—120
50% 70
MMTCO
2
E/yr
25% 35
MMTCO
2
E/yr 10
Non‐packagingpaperproductsincludemagazinesandthirdclassmail,newspaper,officepaper,phonebooks,andtextbooks.
4
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
5
Box ES-1: Summary of Total Technical Potential Scenarios
Land Revitalization
Estimated GHG
Emission Benefit*
Shift 60% of expected new development to compact development patterns:
2
E/yr Reuse percentage of qualifying EPA-tracked contaminated land for community and utility-scale
wind:
13
50% 20
MMTCO
2
E/yr
25% 10
MMTCO
2
E/yr
100% 0.4
MMTCO
2
E/yr
50% 0.2
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Reduce electricity use for the most energy-intensive treatment technolo
g
ies at National Priorities List
LookingForward
ThereisastronglinkbetweenU.S.GHGemissionsandthemanagementofmaterialsandland.EPA,
alongwithitspartners,canhelpaddressthechallengesofglobalclimatechangethroughmaterialsand
landmanagementprograms.Aswedevelopprogramsandpolicieswithourpartners,moredetailed
studiesthataccountforboththelimitationsandopportunitiesofeconomic,technical,andpolicy
aspectsofthescenariosintroducedinthispaperwillbeneeded.
11
Expectedannualbenefitthrough2030.
12
The100%scenariorepresents141timestheprojectedincreaseinsolarpowerbetween2008and2030.SeeAppendixformoredetail.
13
The100%scenariorepresents75%ofprojectedincreaseinwindpowerbetween2008and2030.SeeAppendixformoredetail.
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
SECTION1
INTRODUCTION
Climatechangeisaseriousglobalchallenge.Atmosphericgreenhousegas(GHG)concentrationshave
increasedsignificantlyfrompre‐industriallevelsasaresultofhumanactivities.Warmingoftheclimate
systemisunequivocal,asisnowevidentfromobservationsofincreasesinglobalaverageairandocean
temperatures,widespreadmeltingofsnowandice,andrisingglobalaveragesealevel.
14
Furthermore,
theU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)hasproposedthatclimatechangeisprimarilythe
resultofGHGemissions,itseffectswillworsenovertimeintheabsenceofregulatoryactionandthe
overallrateandmagnitudeofhuman‐inducedclimatechangewilllikelyincrease,suchthatrisksto
publichealthandwelfarewilllikewisegrowovertimesothatfuturegenerationswillbeespecially
vulnerable;theirvulnerabilitywillincludepotentiallycatastrophicharms.
4
,N
2
O,and
HFCsfromnewmotorvehiclesandnewmotorvehicleenginescontributetotheatmospheric
concentrationsofthesekeygreenhousegasesandhencetothethreatofclimatechange.
19
EPAhas
alsoproposedtorequireGHGemissionsreportingbylargeemittersandannouncedplanstopropose
14
IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.FourthAssessmentReport(AR4).pp.30,74,189.Availableat: />report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf
15
ProposedEndangermentandCauseorContributeFindingsforGreenhouseGasesUnderSection202(a)oftheCleanAirAct.ProposedRule.74Fed.
Reg.18886‐18910.April24,2009.
16
Easterling,William,Hurd,Brian,andSmith,Joel.2004.CopingwithGlobalClimateChange:TheRoleofAdaptationintheUnitedStates.PewCenter
onGlobalClimateChange.
17
Ibid.
18
IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.2007.SummaryforPolicymakersinClimateChange2007:Impacts,AdaptationandVulnerability.p.15.
CambridgeUniversityPress,Cambridge,UnitedKingdomandNewYork,NY,USA.
19
ProposedEndangermentandCauseorContributeFindingsforGreenhouseGasesUnderSection202(a)oftheCleanAirAct.ProposedRule.74Fed.
Reg.18886‐18910.April24,2009.
6
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
GHGemissionsstandardsforallnewcarsandlight‐dutytrucks(modelyears2012‐2016)soldinthe
significantopportunitiestoreduceoravoidGHGemissionsbyimprovingournation’smaterialsand
landmanagementpractices;theseapproachescomplementandsupportend‐of‐pipecontrols,sector‐
basedandothermitigationstrategies.
Materialsmanagementreferstohowwemanagematerialresourcesastheyflowthroughthe
economy,fromextractionorharvestofmaterialsandfood(e.g.,mining,forestry,andagriculture),
productionandtransportofgoods,provisionofservices,reuseofmaterials,and,ifnecessary,disposal.
EPApromotesmaterialsmanagementapproachesthatservehumanneedssustainablybyminimizing
theamountofmaterialsinvolvedandtheirassociatedenvironmentalimpacts.
26
20
Seee.g.,ProposedEndangermentandCauseorContributeFindingsforGreenhouseGasesUnderSection202(a)oftheCleanAirAct.ProposedRule.
74Fed.Reg.18886‐18910(April24,2009).NoticeofUpcomingJointRulemakingtoEstablishVehicleGHGEmissionsStandardsandCAFEStandards,
74Fed.Reg.24007(May22,2009).
21
Emergencyresponseandpreparedn esswillbeacentralpartoftheresponsetoclimatechange,butisnotthefocusofthisdocument.
22
U.S.DepartmentofEnergy,EnergyInformationAdministration.EnergyConsumption,Expenditures,andEmissionsIndicators,1949‐2007.
Table1.5Availableat: />23
UniversityofMichigan,CenterforSustainableStudies.2002.U.S.MaterialsUseFactsheet.Availableat: />18.pdf
24
U.S.EPA.2006.SolidWasteManagementandGreenhouseGases:ALifeCycleAssessmentofEmissionsandSinks.p.ES‐1.Availableat:
/>25
KolankiewiczandBeck.2001.WeighingSprawlFactorsinLargeU.S.Cities:AnalysisofU.S.BureauoftheCensus
Dataonthe100LargestUrbanizedAreasoftheUnitedStates.Availableat: />26
U.S.EPA.2003.BeyondRCRA:WasteandMaterialsManagementintheYear2020.Availableat: />“SustainableMaterialsManagement:TheRoadAhead”buildsonthisreportandisscheduledtobepublishedinFall2009
Bytakingadvantageofopportunitiespresentedbymaterialsandlandmanagement,EPAandits
partnerscancontributetoareductionoravoidanceofGHGemissionsaswellasimprovementto
publichealthandtheenvironment.
LeveragingOSWERprogramstoachievemeasurableclimatechangebenefitsinnowayreplacesor
supersedesotherOSWERprogramgoals.Rather,thisdocumentpromotestherecognitionthat
materialsandlandmanagementprogramshavesignificantclimatebenefitswhileyieldingpositive
environmental,economic,andsocietalco‐benefitsincommunitiesacrossthecountry.
Inthecaseofmaterialsmanagement,themajorityofGHGreductionbenefitsfromrecyclingorwaste
preventioncomefromtheenergysavingsfromavoidedresourceextractionandmaterials
processing.
29
Thisenergysavingscarriesco‐benefitsofimprovementsinlocalairquality.Similarly,the
conservationofrawmaterialreducesenvironmentaldegradationandwaterpollutionfrommining,
logging,andoilextraction.
Materialsmanagementoptionsoftenalsohaveeconomicbenefitsforcommunities.Forexample,
recyclingatonofmaterialcreatesmanymorejobsthansendingthesamematerialtoalandfill
27
Ibid.
28
Formoreinformationonthedefinitionofsmartgrowth,includingthetenbasicprinciplesofsmartgrowth,andsmartgrowthapproaches,referto:
/>29
U.S.EPA.2006.SolidWasteManagementandGreenhouseGases:ALife‐CycleAssessmentofEmissionsandSinks.Availableat:
/>
8
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
addition,wewillshareinformationonthemitigationimpactsofcurrentmaterialsandland
managementprogramsonGHGemissionsandultimatelydevelopmorespecificapproachesto
implementmaterialsandlandmanagementactivitiesthatcouldachieveGHGemissionreductions.
Theremainderofthisdocumentisorganizedintothefollowingsections.Section2presentsannual
GHGemissionsintheUnitedStatesusingtwoapproaches.Thesector‐basedapproachallocates
emissionstoeconomicorend‐usesectorsincludingtheelectricpowerindustry,transportation,
industry,agriculture,commercial,andresidentialsectors.Thesystems‐basedapproachreliesonthe
samedata,butapportionsemissionstomaterialsmanagement,landmanagement,andothersystems
todemonstratethepotentialimpactmaterialsandlandmanagementhaveontotalU.S.emissions.
Section3presentsresearchintothepotentialGHGreductionsthatcouldbeachievedthrougha
numberofmaterialsandlandmanagementapproaches.Section4summarizesthereportand
describesthedirectionthatfutureresearchmaytake.Finally,thedocumentappendix(Technical
SupportforOpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLand
ManagementPractices)presentsthedatasourcesandmethodologyusedtodevelopthisreport.
30
ETAAC.RecommendationoftheEconomicandTechnologyAdvancementandAdvisoryCommittee(ETAAC).CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard.February,
2008.Available: />31
NortheastRecyclingCouncil.“RecyclingEconomicInformationStudyUpdate:Delaware,Maine,Massachusetts,NewYork,andPennsylvania.”
February,2009.
32
InstituteforLocalSelfReliance.“WastetoWealth.”AccessedJuly,2009.Available: />33
Wernstedt,Kris.2004.“OverviewofExistingStudiesonCommunityImpactsofLandReuse.”NationalCenterforEnvironmentalEconomicsWorking
Paper#04‐06.U.S.EPA.
34
Paull,Evans.2008.“TheEnvironmentalandEconomicImpactsofBrownfieldsRedevelopment.”Northeast‐MidwestInstitute.Availableat:
/>35
Paull,Evans.2008;updatedJune11,2009.“EnergyBenefitsofUrbanInfill,Brownfields,andSustainableUrbanDevelopment:AWorkingPaper.”
Availableat: y_benefits_infill_brfds_final_12‐08.pdf
figure excludes emissions from U.S. territories, which are not allocated to economic sectors. 36
U.S.EPA.2008.InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2006.Availableat:
/>version,InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2007,waspublishedin2009andcanbefoundat
eport.html.
37
EmissionsfromU.S.territoriesarecategorizedasaseparatesector,totaling1%oftotalU.S.emissions;becausetheseemissionsarenotallocatedto
economicsectors,theyarenotdescribedhere.U.S.EPA.2008.InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990–2006.Executive
Summary,TableES‐7:U.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsAllocatedtoEconomicSectors(TgCO
2
Eq.)Availableat:
/>
10
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
Asector‐basedviewofemissions,becauseitdescribeswhereemissionsarereleased,canbehelpfulfor
framingend‐of‐pipestrategies,suchascarboncaptureandsequestrationatpowerplantsorbiofuel
substitutioninvehicles.Itisalsohelpfulforframingtechnologysubstitutionsthataffectaparticular
sector,suchashybrid‐electricvehicleenginesorsolarelectricitygeneration.
Asector‐basedviewofemissions,however,doesnotshowtherolethatmaterialsandland
managementplayinGHGemissions.Theemissionsassociatedwiththegoodswecreateandconsume,
forexample,areembeddedinportionsoftheIndustry(e.g.,miningandmanufacturing),ElectricPower
Industry(e.g.,electricityuse),Commercial(e.g.disposalofwastes),andTransportation(e.g.,freight)
sectors.Theemissionsrelatedtohowandwherewedeveloplandareassociatedwiththe
Transportation(e.g.,vehiclemilestraveled),Residential(e.g.,subdivisiondevelopment),Commercial
(e.g.,buildingconstruction),andElectricPowerIndustry(e.g.,electricityuse)slicesofthepiechartin
Figure1.
asshowninFigure3:ProvisionofGoodsandProvisionofFood.
39
Thematerialsmanagementsection
ofthepiechartrepresentsU.S.emissionsrelatedtotheextractionorharvestofmaterials(e.g.,mining
forestry,andagriculture),theproductionandtransportofgoodsandfood,theprovisionofservices,
andultimatelythedisposalofgoodsandfood(seeBox1).Everystepinthismaterialflowresultsin
environmentalimpacts,includingGHGemissions.
,
Figure 3
Systems-Based View of U.S. GHG Emissions (2006):
Highlighting Materials Management
This figure reflects the GHG emissions data shown in Figure 1, using a systems-based approach, as described in Appendix A.
Emissions from U.S. Territories are not included in this figure.
TheProvisionofGoodssliceofthepiechartrepresentstheemissionsassociatedwiththegoodsand
serviceswecreate,transport,anddisposeofonadailybasis.Itiscomposedofaporti onofemissions
fromalleconomicsectorsinFigure1,exceptAgriculture.Itscomponentsincludemostofthedirect
emissionsfromtheindustrialsector(withsomeexceptions,suchasfoodandfuelprocessing
40
),
38
SeeAppendixAforadetaileddescriptionofthemethodologyusedtodevelopthepiechartspresentedinFigures2‐4.
39
SeeAppendixAforadetaileddescriptiontheemissionsassociatedwithProvisionofGoodsandProvisionofFood.
40
Someindustrialsectoremissionsareallocatedtootherslices,mostnotablyfoodprocessingemissions(allocatedtoProvisionofFood)andmost
emissionsfromextractionandprocessingoffossilfuels.Emissionsfrompetroleumandnaturalgasextractionandrefining,naturalgasdistribution,
emissionsfromalleconomicsectorsexceptResidential.It
includesdirectemissionsfromagriculturalsources,agricultural
sectorelectricityuse,transportoffood‐relatedproducts(freight),wastewatertreatment(exceptfor
emissionsfrompulpandpapermanufacturingandethanolproduction),theconsumptionoffueland
electricityinfoodandbeverageprocessing,leaksofhydrofluorocarbons(HFCs)fromrefrigeration
equipment,andcomposting.Carbonsequestrationonagriculturallandsiscapturedinthelandsink
discussedbelow.ProvisionofFoodisestimatedtoaccountfor895MMTCO
2
E,or13%,of2006U.S.
GHGemissions.
42
NotethattheU.S.GHGemissionspresentedinFigures1through5representemissionsthatare
releaseddomestically.Emissionsassociatedwithgoodsandservicesthatareproducedinother
countries(i.e.,emissionsassociatedwithextractionofrawmaterials,processing,andproductionof
goodsandservicesoutsidetheUnitedStates)butconsumedintheUnitedStatesarenotcapturedin
theU.S.Inventory,andthereforearenotreflectedhere.Correspondingly,theemissionsassociated
withgoodsandservicesproducedintheUnitedStatesthatareexportedforconsumptioninother
countriesareincluded.Manymaterialsmanagementstrategiesreduceemissionsfromproductionof
goodsoutsidetheUnitedStates,butthosepotentialreductionsarenotreflectedinthisdocument.If
U.S.emissionswerecalculatedusingatotallifecycleperspective,basedongoodsandservices
consumedratherthanproducedintheUnitedStates,theemissionsassociatedwithmaterials
managementwouldbegreaterthanisshownduetothelargequantityofgoodsthatareimported.
43
LandManagement
Thesystems‐basedviewalsohelpsconveytheeffectlandmanagementhasonU.S.GHGemissions.The
landmanagementportionofthepiechartshowninFigure4representstheemissionsandsinks
existing land sink value.
Landmanagementemissionsandsinksaredepictedasfourelementsinthesystems‐basedpiechart.
TheemissionssinkprovidedbysoilandgrowingvegetationintheUnitedStatesisdepictedasthe
outerringofthepiechart(LandSink).Also,therearetwoslicesinthepiechartassociatedwithland
management:Infrastructure,whichconsistsoflifecycleGHGemissionsfromconstructingand
maintainingroadsandwaterinfrastructure,andLocalPassengerTransport.Finally,anestimateofthe
emissionsassociatedwithGreenfieldDevelopmentisdepictedasafloatingpieslice.Further
descriptionofthesepiechartelementsfollows.
TheLandSink,shownastheouterringinFigure4,representstheamountoftotalU.S.emissionsthat
areoffsetbytheamountofcarbonthatisabsorbedbysoilandvegetationintheUnitedStates.The
UnitedStatesisamongthetopfourcountriesintheworldintermsoflandmass.Thislandmass
enablesthestorageandactiveabsorptionofcarbon
44
inthesoil,vegetation,andgroundlittercover
andisreferredtoastheLandSinkorland‐basedcarbonsinkinthisdocument.
Theamountofcarbondioxideequivalentthatisstoredbytheland‐basedcarbonsinkisreportedinthe
annualInventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinksasanegativenumberbecauseitoffsets
44
CarbonsequestrationistheprocessbywhichambientCO
2
isabsorbedandstoredbyvegetation,orothermeans,andremovedfromthe
atmosphere.Foradditionalinformation,referto: />
14
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
totalU.S.emissions.Thecarbonsinkisanetnumber.Themagnitudegivenforthesinkisnetoftwo
smallsourcesofpositiveemissionsfromlandandisdominatedbythenegativeemissionsfrom
development.
Combined, land management is associated
with an estimated 16% to 20%, of 2006 U.S.
anthropogenic emissions, and an emission
offset equivalent to 13% of 2006 U.S.
anthropogenic emissions.
Box 2: Impact of Land Management on
U
.
S
.
G
H
G
Emi
ss
i
o
n
s
InfrastructureisthenextelementofFigure4associatedwith
landmanagement.Thissliceofthepiechartrepresentsthe
emissionsassociatedwiththeconstructionandmaintenance
ofinfrastructure,includinghighways,streets,bridges,
tunnels,water,sewers,andpipelines.Infrastructureispartof
thelandmanagementsystembecauseinfrastructure
constructionandmaintenanceareintrinsicallylinkedwith
landmanagement.Developinggreenfieldsrequires
infrastructuretoconnectnewlydevelopedlandwithexisting
46
Ibid,p.ES‐14.
47
U.S.EPA.October1999.TheTransportationandEnvironmentalImpactsofInfillVersusGreenfieldDevelopment:AComparativeCaseStudyAnalysis.
Availableat: />FringeandBeyond:ImpactsonAgricultureandRuralLand.AgriculturalEconomicReportNo.803.Availableat:
/>andSustainableUrbanDevelopment:AWorkingPaper.”Availableat:
/>48
SeeAppendixAformoredetailonhowtheestimateofGHGemissionsfrominfrastructuredevelopmenttonewlydevelopedgreenfieldwasderived.
49
Ewing,R.,Bartholomew,K.,Winkelman,S.,Walters,J.,andChen,D.2008.GrowingCooler:TheEvidenceonUrbanDevelopmentandClimate
Change.UrbanLandInstitute.Washington,D.C.
15
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
extractingandprocessingfuelsusedforlocalpassengertransport.Theslicerepresents1,019
MMTCO
2
E,or15%of2006U.S.emissions.
50
ThefinallandmanagementelementofFigure4istheadditionalsliceoutsidethepiechart
representingGreenfieldDevelopment.Eachyear,millionsofacresofpreviouslyundevelopedor
agriculturalland(“greenfields”)aredeveloped,
51
resultinginGHGemissionsfromthecarbonsink
providedbyU.S.landandvegetation.However,theGHGemissionsassociatedwithgreenfield
developmentarenotcurrentlycalculatedintheInventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks.
Becausetheseemissionsarerelateddirectlytolandcleanup,revitalizationandreuse,aroughestimate
waspreparedforthisreport.Thisestimateaccountsforforest,grassland,andagriculturalland
53
ThisestimatewasbasedonmethodologiesandrecommendationsmadebytheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChangeinthe2006IPCC
GuidelinesforNationalGreenhouseGasInventories.TheInventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinksalsoreliesonthisIPCCguidance.See
AppendixAforadescriptionofthemethodologyusedtodeveloptheestimateforgreenfielddevelopment.
16
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
Figure 5
Systems-Based View of U.S. GHG Emissions (2006):
Highlighting Other Emissions
This figure shows the same systems-based allocation as Figures 2 through 4,
highlighting the slices not associated with materials management or land management.
UseofAppliancesandDevicesincludesemissionsresultingfromtheelectricityandfuelusedby
washingclothes,cooking,refrigeration,
54
andtheuseofofficeequipment,computers,andother
appliances,aswellastheindustrialemissionsassociatedwithextractingandprocessingtheassociated
fossilfuels.Thelifecycleassociatedwithprovisionofgoodsincludesemissionsfromtheuseof
products,soitcanbearguedthatemissionsassociatedwiththisslicecouldbeincludedinthe
ProvisionofGoodsand/orProvisionofFoodslicesundermaterialsmanagement.Wepresentitasa
separateslicefortworeasons.First,thesystemsarepartlychosentorepresentthedomainofa
particularsetofprevention‐orientedmitigationopportunities.Theopportunitiestoreduceemissions
fromtheUseofAppliancesandDevices—throughimprovedenergyefficiencyorchangesinconsumer
usagepatternsforexample—aredifferentfrommostmaterialsmanagementopportunitiesdiscussed
inthisreport,whichreducewasteorpromotematerialsefficiency.Second,energyefficiency
opportunitiestoreduceGHGemissionshavebeenwidelyexploredelsewhereandthisreportaimsto
highlighttheadditionalmaterialsmanagementopportunitiesthatarelesswell‐known.However,it
understoodcomprehensively,includetheusephaseofbuildings.Approximately1,719MMTCO
2
E,or
25%oftotalGHGemissionsareassociatedwiththisslice.
OtherTransportationEmissionsarelargelycomposedofemissionsfromlong‐distancepassenger
travel(90%oftheremaining“other”transportationemissions),includingemissionsfromaircraft,inter‐
cityrail,inter‐citybuses,cars,andlighttrucksmakinglong‐distancetrips,andupstreamindustrial
sectorfossilfuelcombustion.Miscellaneousemissions,primarilyfrommilitaryaircraftandrecreational
vehicles,comprisedtheother10%ofthiscategory.Inall,non‐localpassengertransportation
accountedfor666MMTCO
2
E,or9%ofUSGHGemissionsin2006.
56
Landmanagementpolicieshave
lessofaneffectonnon‐localtransportation,whichiswhytheseemissionsarepresentedseparately.
Prevention‐orientedpoliciestoreduceinter‐citypassengertransportationincludeactivitieswhichshift
traveltolower‐impactmodesandpromotemoreefficientloadingormovementwithinmodes.
Summary
Thesystems‐basedpiechartshowninFigures2through5providesasenseoftherelativemagnitude
ofemissionsassociatedwithmaterialsandlandmanagement.ByassessingU.S.GHGemissionsfroma
systemsperspective,itisevidentthatmanagementofmaterialsandlandhasasignificantimpacton
thenation’stotalGHGemissionsandsinks.AsshowninFigures3and4andhighlightedinBoxes1and
2,materialsandlandmanagementactivitiescombinetoinfluence58‐62%of2006U.S.anthropogenic
GHGemissions,whilealsooffsetting13%of2006U.S.anthropogenicGHGemissions.
Eachsliceofthesystems‐basedpiechartpresentsopportunitiesforprevention‐andsystems‐oriented
strategiestoreduceGHGemissions.SuchstrategiesforreducingGHGemissionsthroughmaterialsand
landmanagementincludematerialsefficiency,industrialecology,greendesign,landrevitalization,
Flow of Materials
Materialsmanagementseeksthemostproductiveuseofresourcesandfocusesbroadlyonimpacts
andpoliciesrelatingtoallofthestagesofmaterialflow.Byconsideringtheimpactsthroughoutthe
entirelifecycle,materialsmanagementworkstoreduceenvironmentalimpacts,both(1)directlyat
eachstageand(2)indirectlyatmultiplestagesbyreducingtheamountsofmaterialsused,andthus
reducingsystem‐wideenvironmentalimpacts,includingGHGemissions.Throughmaterials
managementapproaches,thesamelevelofservicecanbeprovidedwhilesubstantiallyreducingGHG
emissions.
57
Lifecycleassessment,atechniqueforevaluatingallenvironmentalimpactsassociatedwithaproductthroughoutitslifecycle,canbehelpful
frameworkinthistypeofsystemsanalysis.
19
OpportunitiestoReduceGreenhouseGasEmissionsthroughMaterialsandLandManagementPractices September2009
Thewastemanagementhierarchyisaframeworkthatis
helpfulforunderstandinghowmaterialsmanagement
approachescanbeusedtoinfluencematerialsastheyflow
throughthemateriallifecycle(seeBox3).
58
Sourcereductiondescribesthepracticeofminimizingthe
useofrawmaterialinputsandsubstitutingreusableand
moresustainableinputstoreduceenvironmentalimpacts
andreducewaste.Thismayinvolvemodifyingmaterial
extractionandharvestingpracticesorimprovingproduct
Afterusingproducts,consumerscanreuse,recycle,ordisposeofthem.Reusingandrepurposing
productscandecreaseGHGemissionsbyavoidingtheneedtocreatenewproducts.Inaddition,using
recycledmaterialstocreatenewproductscanreducelifecycleGHGemissions.Whenneitherreuse
norrecyclingispossibleandproductsaredisposed,properdisposalpracticescanmitigateGHG
emissionsandenvironmentalimpactsandrecoveryoftheenergycontainedinmaterialscanreduce
GHGemissionsbyoffsettingfossilfuelcombustion.
59
Throughoutthematerialflow,usingimproveddistributionpracticestoreducetransportation
requirements,andpromotingthereuseandrecyclingofproductsandtheircomponentsthrough
closed‐looporotherapproachescanfurtherreducewasteandGHGemissions.
SignificantGHGemissionreductionshavealreadybeenachievedintheUnitedStatesbyEPA,states,
localgovernments,andstakeholdersthroughnumerousmaterialsmanagement‐relatedactivities(see
Box4).
60
58
ForadditionalinformationontheWasteManagementHierarchy,referto: />59
U.S.EPA.2006.SolidWasteManagementandGreenhouseGases:ALifeCycleAssessmentofEmissionsandSinks.ExhibitES‐4(NetGHGEmissions
fromSourceReductionandMSWManagementOptions(MTCE/Ton)),andp.13.Availableat:
/>60
TheGHGemissionsestimatesinBox4relyonthefollowingdata.(1)HazardousandNon‐hazardousWasteMinimization:U.S.EPA,OfficeofSolid
WasteandEmergencyResponse.November2007.MunicipalSolidWasteGeneration,Recycling,andDisposalintheUnitedStates:FactsandFigures
for2006,p.1.(2)WastetoEnergy:U.S.EPA,OfficeofSolidWasteandEmergencyResponse.November2007.MunicipalSolidWasteGeneration,
Recycling,andDisposalintheUnitedStates:FactsandFiguresfor2006,p.8.(3)EPA’sResourceConservationChallenge:PartnershipPrograms,
MunicipalSolidWaste,WasteWise:U.S.EPA.October2006.WasteWise2006AnnualReport.p.1.Availableat:
/>Initiatives‐Electronics,Plug‐intoeCycling:Theinformationisbasedonpartnerreportedamountsofe‐wasterecycledin2007.(5)EPA’sResource
In 2005, EPA’s WasteWise partners reported source reduction and recycling activities that resulted in an avoidance of 27 MMTCO
2
E
in GHG emissions.
Tofurtherillustratesomeofthepotentialopportunitiesthatmaterialsmanagementapproaches
provideforreducingGHGemissions,thisanalysispresentsseveraltotaltechnicalpotentialscenarios.
TotaltechnicalpotentialscenariosaredefinedanddescribedinBox5.
Box 5: Total Technical Potential
These scenarios can be considered a first-step analysis for identifying areas of opportunity for EPA and its partners. As we consider
developing programs and policies, more detailed studies that account for economic and practical limitations and opportunities will be
needed. The scenarios suggest how to direct these future efforts to pursue options with the largest impact. Appendix A provides
additional details about the data sources, assumptions, and methodologies used to conduct these analyses.
Such scenarios are a common first step in climate policy analysis and allow for the examination of the GHG reduction potential of
various mitigation strategies. These total technical potential scenarios are useful for scoping the order-of-magnitude impact of an
activity and for identifying areas of promise for more detailed analysis. These scenarios suppose a change from current U.S. business-
as-usual practices and provide an estimate of the potential climate-related benefits from those changes (e.g., reduction in GHG
emissions measured in MMTCO
2
E). Some scenarios represent the GHG emission reduction that could be achieved in addition to
existing materials management practices (e.g., reducing packaging by 50%), while others represent the GHG emission reduction that
could be achieved from existing materials management practices that are enhanced (e.g., recycle 100% of construction and demolition
debris). It should be noted that these reduction rates do not represent EPA goals or targets.
The scenarios selected for this document represent a range of potential reductions (e.g., 0.2 to 2,200 MMTCO
2
E). The majority of
hypothetical reductions are on the same order of magnitude as individual options identified in climate change mitigation analyses
conducted by others (e.g., see McKinsey and Company, “Reducing U.S. GHG Emissions: How Much and at What Cost?” (2007)). For
at least one of these scenarios, landfill methane capture, economic analysis has also been performed which found significant lower-
Model(WARM)andavarietyofotherreports.Forfurtherexplanationofhowthefollowingestimates
weredeveloped,refertoAppendixA.
Thetotaltechnicalpotentialscenariosprovidedherearenotrepresentativeofallpossibleapproaches
toreduceGHGemissionsthroughmaterialsmanagement.Manyofthesescenariosfocusonthewaste
streambecausethedataarelimitedonmaterialsmanagementstrategiesthatfocusonotherpointsin
thematerialsflow.Asfurtherresearchiscompleted,additionaltotaltechnicalpotentialscenarioswill
bedevelopedtounderstandtheGHGemissionreductionsthatcouldbeachievedthroughoutthe
materialsflow.PotentialreductionsfromsomeactivitiesaresummarizedinBox6.
Box 6: Summary of Total Technical Potential Scenarios
Source Reduction
Estimated GHG
Emission Benefit*
Reduce packaging use by:
63
50% 40—105
MMTCO
2
E/yr
25% 20—50
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Reduce use of non-packaging paper products by:
64
MMTCO
2
E/yr
50% 75
MMTCO
2
E/yr
25% 40
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Increase national MSW recycling and composting rate from 2006 rate (32.5%) to:
100% 300
MMTCO
2
E/yr
50% 70—80
MMTCO
2
E/yr
Increase composting of food scraps from 2006 rate (2%) to: