BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG
-------------------------------
ISO 9001:2015
KHÓA LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP
NGÀNH: TIẾNG ANH
Sinh viên : Lê Thị Thanh Dương
Giảng viên hướng dẫn: ThS. Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Chi
HẢI PHÒNG - 2018
BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG
-----------------------------------
TÊN ĐỀ TÀI KHÓA LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP
A STUDY ON TRANSLATION OF ENGLISH TERMS
RELATING TO HOTEL MANAGEMENT INTO VIETNAMESE
KHÓA LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP ĐẠI HỌC HỆ CHÍNH QUY
NGÀNH: TIẾNG ANH
Sinh viên : Lê Thị Thanh Dương
Giảng viên hướng dẫn: ThS. Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Chi
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
2. Các số liệu cần thiết để thiết kế, tính toán.
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
3. Địa điểm thực tập tốt nghiệp.
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
CÁN BỘ HƯỚNG DẪN ĐỀ TÀI TỐT NGHIỆP
Người hướng dẫn thứ nhất:
Họ và tên:
Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Chi
Học hàm, học vị:
Thạc sỹ
Cơ quan công tác:
GS.TS.NGƯT Trần Hữu Nghị
CỘNG HÒA XÃ HỘI CHỦ NGHĨA VIỆT NAM
Độc lập - Tự do - Hạnh phúc
PHIẾU NHẬN XÉT CỦA GIẢNG VIÊN HƯỚNG DẪN TỐT NGHIỆP
Họ và tên giảng viên:
...................................................................................................
Đơn vị công tác:
........................................................................ ..........................
Họ và tên sinh viên:
.......................................... Chuyên ngành: ...............................
Đề tài tốt nghiệp:
...................................................................................................
........................................................... ........................................
Nội dung hướng dẫn:
.......................................................... ........................................
CỘNG HÒA XÃ HỘI CHỦ NGHĨA VIỆT NAM
Độc lập - Tự do - Hạnh phúc
PHIẾU NHẬN XÉT CỦA GIẢNG VIÊN CHẤM PHẢN BIỆN
Họ và tên giảng viên:
..............................................................................................
Đơn vị công tác:
........................................................................ .....................
Họ và tên sinh viên:
...................................... Chuyên ngành: ..............................
Đề tài tốt nghiệp:
......................................................................... ....................
............................................................................................................................ ........
....................................................................................................................................
1. Phần nhận xét của giáo viên chấm phản biện
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
supervisor – Ms. Nguyen Thi Quynh Chi, M.A- who has always been most
willing and ready to give me valuable advice, inspiration and supervision to
finish this study.
My sincere thanks are also sent to the teachers in the English Department
of Haiphong Private University for their useful lessons and whole-hearted
advice during four years studying here.
Last but not least, I would like to give my heartfelt thanks to my family
and my close friends, to whom I have never got enough words to express my
great gratitude for their encouragement and support.
This graduation paper is my sincere thanks to all of you.
Haiphong, August 1 st 2018
Le Thi Thanh Duong
i
LIST OF ACRONYMS:
SL
Source language
TL
Target language
ADJ
Adjective
English for Academic Purpose
EBE
English for Business Economics
EOP
English for Occupational Purpose
ESBP
English for Specific Business Purpose
ESS
English for Social Study
EST
English for Science and Technology
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................. i
LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................. …ii
PART ONE: INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 1
3.3. Terms of Hotel Management ..................................................................13
Chapter II: A study on the translation of English terms relating to Hotel
Management into Vietnamese ...................................................................15
1. Overview of Hotel Management ................................................................15
1.1. Definition of Hotel Management .............................................................15
1.2 Some features of Hotel Management in Vietnam .....................................15
2. The popular construction of terms and strategies applied for translating
Hotel Management terms: ..............................................................................16
2.1. Single terms .............................................................................................16
2.2. Compound terms .....................................................................................16
2.3. Phrases.....................................................................................................18
2.4. Abbreviations ..........................................................................................19
3. Popular strategies and procedures applied in the translation of some
common Hotel Management terms into Vietnamese ......................................20
3.1. Procedures applied in the equivalence translation ...................................20
3.1.1. Literal translation..................................................................................20
3.1.2. Shift or transposition translation ...........................................................20
3.2.Popular strategies and procedures applied in non-equivalence translation22
3.2.1 Translation by paraphrasing unrelated words ........................................22
3.2.2 Translation by paraphrasing related words .......................................... 23
3.2.3.Translation by addition ..........................................................................24
3.2.4.Translation by using loan words ............................................................25
Chapter III: Finding and discussion ...........................................................27
1. Main finding ...............................................................................................27
2. Difficulties in translation of Hotel Management terms...............................28
3. Suggestions for translation of Hotel Management terms ............................28
PART III: CONCLUSION ..........................................................................30
1. Summary of the study.................................................................................30
2.
Aims of the study
The study on translation of education terms aims to figure out an
overview on translation strategies and procedures commonly employed in
translation of Hotel Management terms.
In details, my Graduation Paper aims at:
Collecting and presenting basic English terms in Hotel Management terms.
Providing their Vietnamese equivalents or expressions
1
Analyzing translation strategies and procedures employed in the translation
of these English terms into Vietnamese.
Providing students majoring in the subject and those who may concern
a draft and short reference of basic English terms in Hotel Management.
I hope that this study can provide readers with overall comprehension
about the information from written text and from visual forms of presentation
2
The second part is the Development with three chapters:
Chapter I: Theoretical background: It focuses on the concepts of
translation, terms in English and form of language as well as different
methods used by professional translators.
Chapter II: A study on the translation of English terms relating to Hotel
Management into Vietnamese, including the popular construction of terms
and some strategies applied in translation of some common Hotel
Management terms
Chapter III: Finding and Discussion
The last part is the Conclusion in which I summary the study (experiences
acquired and state the implications for future study).
3
PART TWO: DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER I
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
1. Translation Theory
1.1. Definition of translation
There are many concepts of translation all over the world. Following are some
typical concepts:
Translation is the interpreting of the meaning of a text and the
subsequent production of an equivalent text, likewise called a
"translation", that the text to be translated is called the "source text," and
the language that it is to be translated into is called the "target language"
(TL); the final product is sometimes called the "target text"
Culture words are translated literally. The main use of word-for-word translation
is either to understand the structures of the SL or to analyze a difficult and
complex text as a pre-translation process.
ST: She plays piano very well
TT: Chị ấy chơi piano rất hay.
ST: The party A will incur liability for the victims.
TT: Bên A sẽ chịu trách nhiệm pháp lý đối với các nạn nhân
1.2.2. Literal translation
The SL grammatical constructions are converted to their nearest TL
equivalents but the lexical words are again translated singly, out of context. As a
pre-translation process, this indicates the problems to be solved. An interlinear
translation is a completely literal translation. For some purposes, it is desirable
to reproduce the linguistic features of the source text. Although these literal
translations may be very useful for purposes related to the study of the source
language, they are of little help to speakers of the receptor language who are
interested in the meaning of the source language text. A literal translation
sounds like nonsense and has little communication value. For example:
ST: I tried for a moment to see the situation through her eyes
TT: Tôi đã thử một lần cố nhìn nhận tình huống theo cách nhìn của cô ta
ST: Invite friend about house me play
TT:. Mời bạn về nhà tôi chơi.
1.2.3. Faithful translation
6
The translation reproduces the exact contextual meaning of the original
within the constraints of the grammatical structures of the target language. It
transfers cultural words and preserves the degree of grammatical and lexical
deviation from SL norms. It attempts to be completely faithful to the intentions
and the text-reality of the SL writer.
(2004). For example:
ST:
It would rather the victorious brightness
In an only moment the centenary twinkle
TT: Thà một phút huy hoàng rồi vụt tắt
Còn hơn buồn le lói suốt trăm năm
( Xuân Diệu )
ST: We would like to inform you that the construction of the project is
temporarily delayed due to bad weather.
TT: Chúng tôi muốn thông báo với các ngài rằng do điều kiện thời tiết không
thuận lợi nên việc thi công dự án tạm thời dừng lại.
1.2.6. Free translation
The translation is not close to the original, but the translator just transmits
meanings of the SL in his own words. It reproduces the matter without the
manner, or the content without the form of the original. Usually it is paraphrase
much longer than the original. Therefore, the text in TL sounds more natural. On
the contrary, translating is too casual to understand the original because of its
freedom. For example:
ST: That guy is as poor as a church mouse
TT: Anh ta nghèo rớt mồng tơi.
1.2.7. Idiomatic translation
Idiomatic translation reproduces the “message” of the original but tends to
distort nuances of meaning by preferring colloquialisms and the idiom where
these do not exists in the original. For example:
ST: Man proposes, God disposes
TT: Mưu sự tại nhân, hành sự tại thiên
8
9
According to Koller (1979), there are five types of equivalents:
Denotative equivalent: the SL and the TL words refer to the same thing in
the real world. It is an equivalent of the extra linguistic content of a text.
Connotative equivalent: This type of equivalent provides additional value
and is achieved by the translator’s choice of synonymous words or expression.
Text-normative equivalent: the SL and the TL words are used in the same
or similar context in their respective languages.
Pragmatic equivalent: With readership orientation, the SL and TL text
have the same effect on their respective readers.
Formal equivalent: This type of equivalence produces an analogy of form
in the translation by either exploiting formal possibilities of the TL, or creating
new forms in TL.
Although equivalence translation is defined with different point of view of
theorists, it is the same effective equivalence between SL and TL.
2.
ESP in translation
2.1. D efinition of ESP
ESP is the abbreviation for English for Specific Purpose. It is defined in
the other ways. Some people described ESP as simply being the teaching of
The language used by air traffic controllers or by waiters are examples of
English a restricted language. Mackay and Mountford (1978) clearly illustrate
the difference between restricted language and language with this statement:
“… The language of international air-traffic control could be regarded as
“special”, in the sense that the repertoire required by the controller is strictly
limited and can be accurately determined in situation, as might be the linguistic
needs of a dining-room waiter or air-hostess. However, such restricted
repertoires are not languages, just as a tourist phrase book is not grammar.
Knowing a restricted “language” would not allow the speaker to communicate
effectively in novel situation or in contexts outside the vocational environment”
(p.4-5)
The second type of ESP identified by Carter (1983) is English for
Academic and Occupational purposes. In the “Tree of ESP” (Hutchinson and
Waters, 1987), ESP is broken down into three branches:
English for Science and Technology (EST)
English for Business and Economics (EBE)
English for Social Studies (ESS)
11
Each of these subject areas is further divided into two branches:
English for Academic purpose (EAP)
English for Occupational purpose (EOP).
An example of EOP for the EST branch is “English for Technicians”
whereas an example of EAP for the EST branch is English for Medical Studies.
Hutchinson and Waters (1987) note that there is not a clear-cut distinction
between EAP and EOP: “People can work and study simultaneously; it is also
likely that in many cases the language learnt for immediate use in a study
environment will be used later when the student takes up, or returns to a job”
(p.16). Perhaps this explains Carter’s rationale for categorizing EAP and EOP
terminology. Even then, the main problem is likely to be that of some terms
in the source text which are relatively content-free, and appear only once. If
they are context-bound, you are more likely to understand them by gradually
eliminating the less likely versions.
3.2. The characteristics of terms:
There is distinction between technical and descriptive terms. The original
source language writer may use a descriptive term for a technical object for
three reasons:
The objective is new and not yet has a name.
The descriptive term is being used as a familiar alternative, to avoid
repetition.
The descriptive term is being used to make a contrast with another one.
Normally, you should translate technical and descriptive terms by their
counterparts and, in particular, resist the temptation of translating a descriptive
by a technical term for showing off your knowledge, there by sacrificing the
linguistic force of the SL descriptive term. However, if the SL descriptive term
is being used either because of the SL writer’s ignorance or negligence, or
because the appropriate technical term does not exist in the SL, and in particular
if an object strange to the SL but not to the TL culture is being referred to, then
you are justified in translating a descriptive by a technical term.