Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
PreparedfortheDepartmentofScienceandTechnologyandtheOrganisationforEconomicCo-operation
andDevelopment(OECD)bytheCentreforScience,TechnologyandInnovationIndicators(CeSTII)inthe
KnowledgeSystemsProgrammeoftheHumanSciencesResearchCouncil
PublishedonbehalfoftheDepartmentofScienceandTechnology.
PublishedbyarrangementwiththeOECD.Theopinionsexpressedandargumentsemployedhereindonot
necessarilyreflecttheofficialviewsoftheOrganisationorofthegovernmentsofitsmembercountries.
PublishedbyHSRCPress
PrivateBagX9182,CapeTown,8000,SouthAfrica
www.hsrcpress.ac.za
©2006HumanSciencesResearchCouncil
Firstpublished2006
Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthisbookmaybereprintedorreproducedorutilisedin
anyformorbyanyelectronic,mechanical,orothermeans,includingphotocopying
andrecording,orinanyinformationstorageorretrievalsystem,withoutpermission
inwritingfromthepublishers.
ISBN0-7969-2062-1
CopyeditedbyRobynArnold
TypesetbyRobinTaylor
CoverbyFarmDesign
PrintmanagementbycomPress
DistributedinAfricabyBlueWeaver
SpecialistPublishersRepresentatives
POBox30370,Tokai,CapeTown,7966,SouthAfrica
Tel:+27(0)21701-4477
Fax:+27(0)21701-7302
email:
www.oneworldbooks.com
DistributedinEuropeandtheUnitedKingdombyEurospanDistributionServices(EDS)
ChristiaanRedelinghuys
Chapter5 Mappingandmeasuring:Aholisticapproachtoauditinginnovation 73
VictorRoss&AntonKleingeld
Chapter6 Macroeconomicmeasuresforthereturnoninvestmentininnovation 83
DavidWalwyn
Part2 Approachestomeasuringinnovationinregionsandcountries
Chapter7 Innovationsurveys:LessonsfromtheexperiencesofOECDcountries 93
DominiqueGuellec&BillPattinson
Chapter8 UsingtheOslomethodologytomeasureinnovation:TheCommunity
InnovationSurveyapproach 111
FrankFoyn
Chapter9 Closingthegapsinsystemsofinnovationresearch:Howtoimprovethe
measurementofinnovationfinancebytheCommunityInnovation
Surveys 123
IlianPetkovIliev
Chapter10 AnoverviewofLatinAmericaninnovationsurveys 141
GuillermoAnlló
Chapter11 TheBogotáManual:StandardisinginnovationindicatorsforLatinAmerica
andtheCaribbean 163
GustavoLugones
Chapter12 Innovationindicatorswithinsub-SaharanAfrica:Aspecificcasefor
Tanzania 183
BitrinaDiyamett&SamuelWangwe
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Chapter13 InnovationsurveysinCentralandEasternEurope:Resultsandpolicy
issues 199
SlavoRadosevic
Chapter14 SouthAfrica’sfirstsurveyofinnovationinthemanufacturingsectorand
recommendationsforthenextsurvey 217
WilliamBlankley&DavidKaplan
Table7.2 InnovationratesforEUcountriesbysizeoffirm(1994–1996) 96
Table7.3 Technologicalandnon-technologicalinnovationinAustralia(1993–1994) 97
Table7.4 TechnologicalinnovationinEUcountries(1994–1996) 98
Table7.5 Shareofinnovativeproductsalesinturnover(manufacturing) 100
Table7.6 GrowthinsalesintheNetherlands(1994–1996) 103
Table7.7 FirmproductivityandprofitabilityinAustralia(1993–1994) 103
Table7.8 ImpactofinnovationonproductionactivitiesinAustralia(1996–1997) 104
Table7.9 GrowthinemploymentintheNetherlands(1994–1996) 105
Table7.10 ProportionoffirmsincreasingemploymentinAustralia 106
Table10.1 ComparisonofCIS-2andCIS-3questionnaires 153
TableA10.1 Generalcharacteristicsofthesurveys 157
TableA10.2 Comparisonofthealternativeswithrespectto‘economicobjectivesof
innovation’ 158
TableA10.3 Comparisonofthealternativeswithrespectto‘sourcesofinformationfor
innovation’ 159
TableA10.4 Comparisonofthealternativeswithrespectto‘factorshamperinginnovation
activities’ 160
TableA10.5 OrganisationalcharacterisationofR&D 161
TableA10.6 Comparisonamongthealternativesof‘innovationexpenditures’ 161
TableA10.7 Commonbodyofissuesforcomparison 161
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
M E A S U R I N G I N N O V AT I O N I N O E C D A N D N O N - O E C D C O U N T R I E S
viii
Table12.1 SelectedmacroeconomicindicatorsforTanzania 187
Table12.2 Povertyindicators:comparisonbetweenTanzaniaandaveragesfordeveloping
anddevelopedcountries 188
Table13.1 SharesofinnovativefirmsinEUandCentralandEasternEurope 208
Table13.2 Shareofinnovativeenterprisesbysizeofenterprise(1996–1997) 210
Table13.3 Innovationexpenditureinmanufacturingsectorbyeconomicactivity
(1996–1997) 211
Table19.3 Numberoforganisationsbyeconomicsectorandbyinnovation 314
Table19.4 Themostimportantaimsstimulatinginnovation(1996–1998) 315
Table19.5 Theimportanceofinformationsourcesforinnovationbyeconomic
sector 315
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
ix
Table19.6 Theimportanceofsourcesofinformationbytheirfieldofapplication 316
Table19.7 NumbersandproportionofthoseengagedinR&D 318
Table19.8 Rankingofinnovativeactivitiesbyresourcesallocated(1998) 319
Table19.9 ThefrequencyofR&Dactivity(1996–1998) 320
Table19.10 Rankingofmethodstoprotectcompetitiveadvantage 320
Table19.11 Numberandtypeof‘partnerorganisations’ofrespondingcompanies
participatingininnovationcooperation(1996–1998) 321
Table19.12 Organisationalchangesaffectingturnover(1996–1999) 322
Table19.13 Theeffectsoffactorshinderinginnovation(1996–1998) 323
L I S T O F T A B L E S
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
x
List of figures
Figure2.1 Bargraphoftheentrepreneurshipvariablecorrespondingtoinnovation
climate 24
Figure2.2 Bargraphoftheventurecapitalvariablecorrespondingtoinnovation
climate 24
Figure2.3 Bargraphoftheresearchcollaborationvariablecorrespondingtoinnovation
climate 24
Figure2.4 Bargraphofthelocalcompetitionvariablecorrespondingtoinnovation
climate 25
Figure2.5 Bargraphofthetariffandnon-tariffbarriersvariablecorrespondingto
innovationclimate 25
Figure2.6 Bargraphoftheregulatoryframeworkvariablecorrespondingtoinnovation
manufacturing 203
Figure13.3 Innovationintensityversuspercentageofinnovatorsinmanufacturing
(1996) 203
Figure13.4 AnalyticalframeworkforinterpretingUSforeignpatentdatafor‘catching-up’
economies 204
Figure15.1 Researchmodel 234
Figure15.2 Operationalisationoftheresearchmodel 248
Figure16.1 InnovativeactivitiesofGuangdongprovince(1993) 256
Figure16.2 InnovativeactivitiesofJiangxi(1993) 256
Figure16.3 InnovativeactivitiesinChina(1993) 258
Figure16.4 NumberofemployeesinEuropestem-and-leafplot 262
Figure16.5 TurnoverinthousandsofECUinEuropestem-and-leafplot 263
Figure16.6 NumberofemployeesinChinastem-and-leafplot 263
Figure16.7 TurnoverinthousandsofRMBinChinastem-and-leafplot 264
Figure16.8 InnovationinvestmentexpenditureperemployeeinChinaandEurope(1993)
(atanexchangerateof1ECU=5RMB) 265
Figure16.9 InnovationinvestmentexpenditureperemployeeinChinaandEurope(1993)
(atanexchangerateof1ECU=1.6RMB) 266
Figure17.1 Contextualframeworkforadjudication 282
Figure17.2 OrganisationtypeofTechnologyTop100organisations 287
Figure17.3 Percentagetechnicalgraduatesinthetoptwotiersoftheorganisations’
decision-makingstructures 287
Figure17.4 Percentagerevenuegeneratedfromproducts0–3yearsold 288
Figure17.5 Percentageproductinnovationsdevelopedentirelyin-house 289
Figure17.6 Percentageproductinnovationsthroughalliances/jointventureswith
internationalparties 290
Figure17.7 Percentagerevenuegeneratedfromexportsalesoverthepastthreeyears 290
Figure17.8 R&Dexpenditureasapercentageofturnover 291
Figure17.9 Timereductioninmanufacturingperproductoverthepastthreeyears 292
Figure17.10 Averageageofmanufacturingequipment 292
inestablishingareliable,nationallyandinternationallyacceptedsetofofficialscience
andtechnologystatistics.Thesestatisticsinturnprovidethemainindicatorsrequired
tounderpintheimplementationofSouthAfrica’snationalR&DStrategyasoutlined
bygovernment.In2002,theCentreforScience,TechnologyandInnovationIndicators
(CeSTII)oftheHumanSciencesResearchCouncilwascommissionedbyDSTtoundertake
aregularseriesofR&DandInnovationSurveysinordertoestablishabaselineofofficial
S&Tindicators.InJune2004,theDSTandStatisticsSouthAfricasignedaMemorandumof
Agreementconcerningtherecognitionofofficialnationalscienceandtechnologystatistics.
ThisbookthusrecordsanimportanthistoricalturningpointinSouthAfrica’sprogress
towardsaneffectivenationalsystemofinnovation.Theseminarbroughttotheforesomeof
thekeycriticaldifferencesbetweendevelopedanddevelopingcountriesintheirapproaches
tomeasuringinnovation.Thesedifferencesareclearlyreflectedinthevariouschapters
ofthisbook,whichcoversomeofthemostimportantdebatesthatemergedduringthe
seminar.
RobAdam
Director-General
DepartmentofScienceandTechnology
SouthAfrica
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
xv
Acknowledgements
TheeditorswishtothanktheSouthAfricanSteeringCommitteefortheseminar(Johann
Mouton,CalliePistorius,BonganiNkosi,KrishPillayandDaveKaplan),ledbyImraan
SaloojeeandmanagedbyMarjoriePyoos.ThanksarealsoduetotheteamfromtheOECD
Secretariat,AndrewWyckof,JeanGuinet,LaudelineAuriolandDominiqueGuellec,who
providedvaluableassistancetotheDepartmentandtheSteeringCommitteeinorganising
theseminar.Inparticular,wewouldliketoexpressourgratitudetotheSteeringCommittee
forundertakingthetaskofpeer-reviewingandselectingpapersfortheseminar,andtoRob
Adam,Director-GeneraloftheDST,whoprovidedtheopeningaddressaswellasArno
Technology
DACST DepartmentofArts,Culture,ScienceandTechnology(SouthAfrica)
DISKO DanishInnovationSysteminKOmparativeperspective
DTI DepartmentofTradeandIndustry
EBRD EuropeanBankforReconstructionandDevelopment
EC EuropeanCommission
ECU EuropeanCurrencyUnit
EEA EuropeanEconomicArea
ERP EconomicRecoveryProgramme
ESRF EconomicandSocialResearchFoundation
EU EuropeanUnion
FDI Foreigndirectinvestment
FRD FoundationforResearchDevelopment
GATT GeneralAgreementonTariffsandTrade
GDP Grossdomesticproduct
GERD GrossnationalexpenditureonR&D
GNP Grossnationalproduct
HCSO HungarianCentralStatisticalOffice
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
M E A S U R I N G I N N O V AT I O N I N O E C D A N D N O N - O E C D C O U N T R I E S
xviii
HDI Humandevelopmentindex
ICRG Internationalcountryriskguide
ICT Informationandcommunicationtechnology
IKU InnovationResearchCentre,Budapest
IMR Infantmortalityrate
IOI InventoryofOrganisationalInnovativeness
IPAR InstituteofPersonalityAssessmentandResearch
ISIC InternationalStandardIndustrialClassification
ISP IndustrialStrategyProject
RTD Researchandtechnologicaldevelopment
SADC SouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunity
SAIS SouthAfricanInnovationSurvey
S&T Scienceandtechnology
SBIR SmallBusinessInnovationResearchProgramme
SESSI ServicedesÉtudesetStatistiquesIndustrielles
SISAMF SurveyofInnovationinSouthAfricanManufacturingFirms
SME Smallandmediumenterprises
SOE State-ownedenterprise
SSB StateStatisticalBureau(China)
TBP Technologybalanceofpayment
TEMDO TanzaniaEngineeringandManufacturingDesignOrganisation
THRIP TechnologyandHumanResourcesforIndustryProgramme
TIRDO TanzaniaIndustrialResearchDevelopmentOrganisation
TPP Technologicalproductandprocess
TRIZ TheoryofSolvingInventiveProblems
UK UnitedKingdom
UNESCO UnitedNationsEducational,ScientificandCulturalOrganisation
UNIDO UnitedNationsIndustrialDevelopmentOrganisation
UNU/INTECH UnitedNationsUniversityInstituteofTechnology
URT UnitedRepublicofTanzania
US/USA UnitedStates/UnitedStatesofAmerica
WIPO WorldIntellectualPropertyOrganisation
WTO WorldTradeOrganisation
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
1
Introduction
Mario Scerri
wasillsuitedfortheanalysisoftheeconomicroleofinnovation.Thesetwodevelopments
providedwhatonemaycallthepoliticalbasis,themotiveforce,fortheemergenceofthe
newsurvey.
Thedevelopmentofanewsurvey,seekingnewdataandnewwaysoforganising
information,isnolightmatter,andthesignificanceofanewsurveyisobviouslymost
pronouncedwhenitreflectsashiftinthetheoreticalbase,inthiscasefromneoclassicalto
evolutionarytheory.Thescopeofsurveysthatareadoptedbygovernmentsisanchoredin
governance,andthedevelopmentofsuchsurveysisthusfundamentallydifferentfromthe
normalprocessofacademicenquiry.Thereisalwaysaninevitablereciprocalrelationship
betweentheobjectofenquiryandthemodeofenquiry,butinthecaseofofficialsurveys,
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
M E A S U R I N G I N N O V AT I O N I N O E C D A N D N O N - O E C D C O U N T R I E S
2
especiallythosethatarestandardisedforgroupingsofcountries,thisrelationshiptends
tosetearly.Inanewtypeofsurveythatemergesfromashiftintheoreticalfoundations,
thisreciprocityisacoreareaofconcern,sinceitsetstheformandtheparametersfor
futurediscourse.Herewemayusetheanalogyoflock-intechnologiesandcumulative
pathdependencytocautionagainstthetoorapidadoptionofasetmodeofenquiry.At
thisinitialstageoftheemergenceofthenewsurvey,thefirstfocusisonthechoiceof
informationthatisrequiredandthedatathatwillbegatheredtocapturesuchinformation.
Theissuesofinclusionandexclusionthatariseatthisstageshouldproceedfromaclear
statementoftheobjectofenquiry.However,apristinearticulationisoftendifficult
intheperiodofparadigmatictransitions.Itispreciselyatthisearlystagethataclear
understandingoftheintentionalityofofficiallycompiledstatisticsisnecessary,bothfor
theanalystandforthepolicy-maker.Thestatementoftheobjectiveofthenewsurveyhas
tobeasexplicitaspossibleandbecontinuouslyre-examined.Theremustalsobeaclear
recognitionoftheconsequentandinevitabletrutheffectsofofficialstatistics.Withrepeated
applicationofagivensurveyform,thedefinitionoftheobjectofenquirybecomesfixed,
anditbecomesincreasinglyimprobablethatalternativeformswillemerge.
Thecriteriaforinclusionandexclusionarenumerous.Themostobviousoneisthe
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
I N T R O D U C T I O N
3
process.Thecontributionsinthisbookcertainlyofferwidecoverageoftheissuesandthe
potentialproblemsandpitfallsoftheemergingsurveysoninnovation.Intheprocess,they
setthescopeforanexcitingagendaforfutureresearchonthevariousaspectsofinnovation
surveys.Theyrangefromthepurelytheoreticalexplorationofthefoundationofinnovation
surveystonumerousexpositionsofalternativeinnovationsurveystructuresinavariety
ofdevelopmentcontexts.Anyclassificationsystemisperforcearbitraryandimperfect,
andthisisalsotrueofthesectionswithinwhichthevariouscontributionsinthisbook
havebeenplaced.Thesectionsareuseful,however,inprovidingastructurewithinwhich
thecontributionsmaybeplacedinrelationshiptooneanotherandtotheissuesthatthey
address.
Thecontributionsinthisvolumehavebeenplacedinthreebroadsections.Thoughthe
areasthatareaddressedthroughoutthebookobviouslyoverlapsubstantially,thegrouping
ofthevariouschaptersoffersaprogressionfromamoretheoreticalapproachtotheissue
ofwhatwemaycallthelocalisationofinnovationsurveysinanalysesthatbecomespecific
toregion,country,industryand,finally,organisation.Again,thereisaloosetransitionfrom
theorytopraxisinthisbookthatmirrorstheemergenceofinnovationsurveysfromthe
theoryoftheeconomicsofinnovation;but,takentogether,thisbodyofworkismorethan
that.Initscoverageofthegamutofthetheoretical,methodologicalandeventhepractical
implicationsofinnovationsurveys,itprovidesareferencesetforanumberofinterlocking
debatesinthisarea.Itsetstheframeworkfortheemergingdiscourseoninnovationsurveys,
theiranchorage,thelimitationsoftheirvariousspecificitiesandthepossibilitiesfortheir
evolution.
Thefirstsectionlooksatthetheoreticalfoundationsonwhichinnovationsurveysare
constructed.Thesixcontributionsinthissectionintroducetherelationshipbetweentheory
andtheconsequentempiricalmethodologycontainedininnovationsurveys.Ifthereis
oneprimeunderlyingconcerninthisrelationship,itwouldbethatofthe‘unsaid’–the
omissionsandthenon-explicitassumptionsofsurveymethodology.Itisinthistenebrous
InnovationSurveyfromCIS-1toCIS-3.Intheprocess,heprovidesaframeworkwithin
whichthemainmethodologicalissuesmaybeidentifiedandlocated.GuellecandPattinson
gointothesurveyfindingsforspecificOECDcountriesandintheprocesstheyhighlight
thecoreissuesoftheintentionsoftheCIS,thecomparabilityofitsresultsacrossOECD
membercountriesanditsmethodologicalshortcomings.Ilievopensuptherelativelylittle-
exploredareaofinnovationfinance,whichisradicallydistinctfromfinancingothertypesof
investment.Consequently,theincidenceandthenatureoftheinstitutionalbottlenecksinthe
flowoffinanceforinnovationactivityaresubstantial,variedandcertainlycontextspecific.
Thisshouldthereforebeaseriousareaforconcernwhendesigninginnovationsurveys.
Inthecaseofspecificregionalrequirements,thethreemainregionsthatareaddressedare
LatinAmerica(Anlló&Lugones),Africa(Diyamett&Wangwe)andCentralandEastern
Europe(Radosevic).Anllóshowsthatthenatureofinnovationthattakesplacesinspecific
countriesandregionscandirectlyandsignificantlyaffecttheappropriatenessofspecific
surveymethodologies.Inaveryclearmannerderivedfromaspecificempiricalcontext,this
paperarguesthatsurveydesignshouldbeprecededbyaclearunderstandingofthespecific
structureoftheinnovationsystemthatistobecovered.Anllóalsomakesastrongargument
forcoordinatedinnovationsurveysacrossinnovationsystemsthatsharecommoncore
characteristics.ThisrequirementisaddressedinLugones’sexpositionoftheBogotáManual,
whichprovidesthemodelforaninnovationsurveythatisindeedrelevanttoLatinAmerica,
whilepermittingcomparativeanalysisbothwithintheregionandwithotherregions.Ina
similarmanner,Diyamett&Wangweproposethatinnovationineconomieswithverylow
levelsoftechnologicalcapabilitieshastobedefineddifferentlyfrominnovationactivityin
technologicallyricheconomies.Theyshowthatmostofthemeasuresthatarecommonly
usedtocaptureinnovation,suchasformalresearchandexperimentaldevelopment(R&D)
investmentprogrammes,areinappropriatewhenappliedtoTanzaniaandsimilarcountries.
Instead,theemphasisofinnovationsurveysforsucheconomiesshouldbeonlearning
processes.Theargumentthatisadvancedimplicitlyisthatnotonlydoesthetheoretical
foundationhavetobeclearlyspecified,butthatthereshouldalsobeaclearunderstanding
oftheobjectoftheenquirybeforetheformoftheenquiryisdesigned.Inhisassessmentof
innovationsurveysinCentralandEasternEurope,Radosevicaddressesanumberofbroader
almostoverwhelmingpossibilitiesforextensionstoinnovationsurveys.Thesecondcategory
looksatthesurveyrequirementsofspecificindustriesorsectorsinspecificcountries.The
twocontributionsinthiscategoryrefertotheplasticsindustryinSouthAfrica(Roberts)and
theservicesectorinHungary(Inzelt).
Ifweaccepttheaccountoftheevolutionofknowledgesystemsthatformsthebasisof
innovationtheory,wemustalsoaccepttheinevitabilityofthe‘lifecycle’progressionof
innovationtheoryitself,atleastascurrentlyformulated.Wemustexpectthatthisparadigm
willunavoidablyreachitslimitsasanexplanationofeconomicchangeandthatitwill
becomeobsoleteasacriticalmassofinexplicablephenomenaprovidesthebasisforthe
nextparadigmshift.Thisprogressionwilloccurbothwithinthecontextoftheoretical
developmentinthisfieldandinthelinkedbodyofempiricalresearch.Thetimespanofthis
progressionobviouslydependsonacomplexinterdependenceofnumerousfactors,butone
ofthemoreimportantonesiscertainlytheroleplayedbyinnovationsurveys,theadoption
ofwhicharguablyconstitutesthemostimportantpoliticalgainofthenewtheorytodate.
Theconsolidationoftheshiftinturndependsontheevolvingpolicyinforminganalytical
prowessofinnovationsurveys.Itisinthisrespectthattheworksinthisvolume,atthis
earlystageofthedevelopmentofinnovationsurveys,canplayanimportantrole.Wehope
thatthisbodyofwork,initsrangeandscope,providesavaluablebasisfortheprogressive
enrichmentandapplicabilityofinnovationsurveystotheissuesandproblemsinan
increasinglycomplexarrayofinnovationsystemsintheemergingglobaleconomy.
References
Hacking,I.1991.Howshouldwedothehistoryofstatistics?InI.Burchell,G.,Gordon,C.&Miller,P.
(eds).TheFoucaultEffect:StudiesinGovernmentality.UK:HarvesterWheatsheaf.
OECD(OrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment).1992.OsloManual:OECDProposed
GuidelinesforCollectingandInterpretingTechnologicalInnovationData.Paris:OECD.
OECD.1997.NationalInnovationSystems.Paris:OECD.
Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za