VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES
  

TRIỆU THỊ GIANG TEACHING GRAMMAR TO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
THROUGH COMMUNICATIVE TASKS
A quasi-experimental study

(Dạy ngữ pháp cho học sinh trung học phổ thông qua các hoạt động giao
nhiệm vụ - Một nghiên cứu bán thực nghiệm ) M.A MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS
FIELD: METHODOLOGY
CODE: 601410
HANOI - 2010

MA Thesis

4
Table of contents Page
Certificate of the study project report……………………………………………………i
Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………… …ii
Abstracts……………………………………………………………………. ……………iii
Tables of contents……………………………………………………………………… iv
List of tables and figures………………………………………………………………….vi
List of abbreviation…………………………………………………………………… vii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTIOn. ………………………………………………………1
1.1. Rationale ………………………………………………… …… 1
1.2. Aims of the study……………………………………………… …………………… 2
1.3. Research hypothesis and questions……………………………… 2
1.4. Research hypothesis and questions……………………………… 2
1.5. Significance of the study………………………………………….……………… 2
1.6. Scope of the study …………………………………………………………………….3
1.7. Organization of the study ………………………………………… 3
1.8. Summary……………………………………………………………………………….3
Chapter 2: Literature review…………… ………………… …… ……….4
2.1. The role of grammar in foreign language teaching and learning………………… 4
2.1.1. Arguments in favor of grammar teaching…………………………… …………… 4

3.7.2. The subjects' attitudes towards the new teaching method-teaching
grammar through communicative tasks…………………………………………… 32
3.8. Discussion.……………………………………………………………. …………… 35
3.8.1. The impact of the TBLT on grammar acquisition……………… 35
3.8.2. Students' attitudes towards teaching grammar through communicative tasks………36
3.9. Summary……………………………………………………… 36
Chapter 4: Recommendations and conclusions…………………… 38
4.1. Some recommendations……………………………………… 38
4.2. Limitations of the study…………………………………………………………… 38
4.3. Summary ……………………………………………… … ……………………… 39
References…………………………………………………………………………….40
Appendix 1. The Pretest……………………………………………………………………I
Appendix 2. The Posttest…………………………………………………………………III
Appendix 3. Post-questionnaire program for the experimental students…… …… V
Appendix 4. Tasks for teaching conditional sentence type 2…………………………. VI
Appendix 5. Tasks for teaching should or should not……………………………… VIII
Appendix 6. The results of the pretest and posttest of the two groups……………… X