Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking
and Business
A Study of Bloor Street in Toronto’s Annex Neighbourhood
February 2009
SmithLeaandStephanieTencer.
©CleanAirPartnership,2009
Formoreinformation,contact:
CleanAir
Partnership
75ElizabethStreet
Toronto,Ontario,M5G1P4,Canada
416‐392‐6672
Additionalcopiesofthispublicationmaybedownloadedatwww.cleanairpartnership.org
TheCleanAirPartnership(CAP)isaregisteredcharitythatworksinpartnershipto
promoteandcoordinateactionstoimprovelocalairqualityandreducegreenhousegases
forhealthycommunities.Ourappliedresearchonmunicipalpoliciesstrivestobroaden
andimproveaccesstopublicpolicydebateonairpollutionand
climatechangeissues.
Oursocialmarketingprogramsfocusonenergyconservationactivitiesthatmotivate
individuals,government,schools,utilities,businessesandcommunitiestotakeactionto
cleantheair.i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6.Conclusions&Recommendations 25
References 26
AppendixA–MerchantSurvey 27
AppendixB–PedestrianSurvey 28
ii
LIST OF TABLES
Table1.Distributionofsurveyrespondentsbysurveylocation 11
Table2.Distributionofsurveyrespondentsbysurveydayoftheweek 12
Table3.Merchantestimateofcustomersthatdriveandparkinthearea 15
Table4.NumberofdayspermonthvisitingtheBloorAnnex 17
Table5.Moneyspentintheareapermonth 17
Table6.Preferredchangetothestreet 18
Table7.BloorStreetandSpadinaRoadaverageon‐streetparkingusage 20
Table8.BloorStreetandSpadinaRoadaveragehourlyon‐streetparkingusage21
Table9.TorontoParkingAuthorityaverageparkinglotusage 22
LIST OF MAPS
Map1.TheBloorAnnexneighbourhoodwithinthelargerTorontocontext 3
Map2.SuggestedBloor‐DanforthBikeway 5
Map3.TheAnnexLandUse 8
Map4.TheAnnexbuiltformandtransportationnetwork 9
Map5.MunicipalpaidparkingoptionsintheAnnex 8
Map6.Pedestrianinterceptlocations 11
Map7.Studyareaboundary 16
Map8.Pedestriansurveyrespondents’placesofresidence–Scale:Greater
TorontoArea 17
theimplementationofbikelanesonmajorstreetsbeaccelerated.TheBloor‐Danforthcorridoris
aparticularlyattractiveoptionforacity‐wide
east‐westbikelaneinTorontobecauseitisoneof
theonlylong,straight,relativelyflatroutesthatconnectsthecityfromendtoend;thereareno
streetcartracks;andithasoneofthehighestincidencesofbicyclecollisionsinthecity.
Thisreportisaboutthedevelopment
andtestingofnewanalytictoolstodeterminethepublic
acceptabilityandeconomicimpactofreallocatingroadspace.Thestudy–conductedinJulyof
2008–surveyedtheopinionsandpreferencesof61merchantsand538patronsonBloorStreet
andanalyzedparkingusagedatainthearea.
Among
thestudy’sfindings:
• Only10%ofpatronsdrivetotheBloorAnnexneighbourhood;
• Evenduringpeakperiodsnomorethanabout80%ofpaidparkingspacesarepaidfor;
• Patronsarrivingbyfootandbicyclevisitthemostoftenandspendthemostmoneyper
month;
• There
aremoremerchantswhobelievethatabikelaneorwidenedsidewalkwould
increasebusinessthanmerchantswhothinkthosechangeswouldreducebusiness;
• Patronswouldpreferabikelanetowidenedsidewalksataratioofalmostfourtoone;
and
• Thereductioninon‐streetparking
supplyfromabikelaneorwidenedsidewalkcouldbe
accommodatedinthearea’soff‐streetmunicipalparkinglots.
Thespendinghabitsofcyclistsandpedestrians,theirrelativelyhightravelmodeshare,andthe
minimalimpactonparkingalldemonstratethatmerchantsinthisareaareunlikely tobe
negativelyaffected
byreallocatingon‐streetparkingspacetoabikelane.Onthecontrary,this
changewilllikelyincreasecommercialactivity.
Itisrecommendedthatthistypeofstudybereplicatedonothercommercialstreetswherethere
toallmunicipalitiessothattheycanreplicatethestudyintheirownjurisdictions.Thistoolwill
helpmunicipalitiesdeterminewhethervocalopponentsofbikelanesreflecttheopinionsofthe
majorityandwhetherwarningsaboutlossofbusiness
fromreducedparkingareaccurate.
1.2 STUDY DESCRIPTION
Thestudyincorporatedaseriesofsurveysto:a)determinetherelativeimportanceofon‐street
parkingtobusinessactivityonBloorStreetWestintheAnnex,a medium‐to‐high‐density,
traditionalcommercialstreetindowntownToronto;andb)projecttheimpactsonbusiness
activityofreallocatingspaceinthe
Annexfromon‐streetparkingtobikelanes orwidened
sidewalks.Forthepurposesofthisstudy,theBloorAnnexneighbourhoodwasdefinedasthe
areasurroundingBloorStreet,boundedbyPalmerstonBoulevardtotheWest,HuronStreetto
theEast,DupontStreettotheNorthandHarbordStreetto
theSouth(seeMap1.TheBloor
AnnexneighbourhoodwithinthelargerTorontocontext).
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 3
Map 1. The Bloor Annex neighbourhood (highlighted in orange) within the larger Toronto context
(Source data: Google Earth,)
Datawerecollectedusingthefollowingsources:
1. Asurveyofareamerchantstogaugeassumptionsaboutthemodesoftransportation
patronsusetoaccesstheneighbourhoodandinwhatproportions.
2. Apedestrianinterceptsurveytodeterminehowpatronsaccesstheneighbourhood,how
often,andhowmuchmoneytheyspend
there.Thissurveyalsoincludedaquestion
aboutthetypeofroadspaceallocation(tocars,bikes,orpedestrians)theywouldprefer.
3. On‐streetparkingdatatodeterminewhatpercentageoftheon‐streetparkingspacesare
occupiedatdifferenttimesofday.
4. Off‐streetparkingdatato
process.Buteveninthe2008constructionseason,Citystaffwereunabletoconsistentlycount
onallthenecessaryapprovalsatCityCouncil.
Almosteverynewbikelaneintheoldercity–wherestreetsarenarrowerthaninsuburban
areas–hasinvolvedtheremoval
ofatleastsomeon‐streetparking.Theremovalofon‐street
parkingcapacityisabigconcernforsomebusinessownerswhobelievethatthemajorityof
theircustomersarrivebycar.Theyare concernedthatifthereisn’tsufficientparkingveryclose
athand,itwilldetersome
customersfromvisitingthebusiness.Inmostinstances,thereisvery
littleevidencetosupportornegatethisconcern.
Forquitesometimecyclingadvocates–andsomeCitystaff–havebeenlookingathowto
makeamajoreast‐westbikewayinToronto.Someproposethatthemostattractive
optionisthe
Bloor‐Danforthcorridor,stretchingalmost20kilometresacrossthecity.TheCitydidnot
includethisrouteinits2001BikewayNetworkplan,though earliercityreportsdidrecommend
aBloorbikelane.
Map 2. Suggested Bloor-Danforth Bikeway (Source data: Google Earth)
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 6
Theindependentcommunitycyclinggroup,BellsonBloor,hascompilednumeroussupporting
reasonsforchoosingBloorastheCity’smajoreast‐westbikeartery(BellsonBloor,2007).These
include:
• Blooralreadyhasoneofthehighestratesofcyclingintheentirecity.Goodbikerouteplanning
placesbikelaneswherethecyclistsalreadyare;
• Bloorhasoneofthehighestincidencesofbicyclecollisionsinthecity;
• Bloorisoneoffewlong,straight,relativelyflatroutesthatconnectsthecityfromendtoend;
• Therearenostreetcartracks,whichcansometimesinterferewiththesafeoperationofabicycle;
• Thecorridorisalsoservedbyasubwayline,whichprovidesafast,frequent,viablealternativeto
driving;
majorityofbusinessesonBloorStreetbetween SpadinaAvenueandBathurstStreet(thestudy
area–seeMap3.TheAnnexLandUse)
arerestaurantsorbars;therestareeitherstoresor
serviceproviders.
Figure 3. Bloor Street facing east at Bathurst Street
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 8
Map 3. The Annex Land Use (Source data: City of Toronto)
TogettotheAnnexneighbourhoodresidentsandvisitorshavemanyoptions.Twosubway
lines,twostreetcarlinesandavarietyofbusroutesfeedintotwosubwaystations(Spadinaand
Bathurst)ateitherendofthestudyarea.Bloorisoneofthebusiestcyclingstreetsinthecityand
hasmorebicycle‐motorvehiclecollisionsthanotherstreets.However,therearecurrentlyno
dedicatedcyclingfacilitiesthatleaddirectlyintothisarea.St.GeorgeStreet–oneofthecity’s
mostpopularnorth‐southbikelanes–isapproximately300metrestotheeastofthestudyarea.
Bloor
Streetisalsoapopularwalkingroutebetweenneighbourhoodstothewestofthestudy
area,theUniversityofTorontojusteastofthestudyarea,andToronto’sdowntowncore.
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 9
Map 4. The Annex built form and transportation network (Source data: City of Toronto)
ForthosewhodrivetotheAnnex,thereison‐streetpaidparkingonBloorStreetandSpadina
Roadatcertaintimesoftheday,dependingonrush‐hourrestrictionsononeorbothsidesofthe
street.Paymentisbymeansof‘pay‐and‐display’machinesscatteredthroughoutthearea,
usuallywithathree‐hourmaximum,andparkingisfreebefore9:00a.m.andafter9:00p.m.
Thereisalsofreeone‐hourparkingbetween10:00a.m.and10:00p.m.onmostsidestreets,with
(TransportationAlternatives&SchallerConsulting,2006).
ThestudyfoundthatpatronsofPrinceStreet’sstoresandrestaurantswouldcomemoreoften,
drawnbythereducedcrowdingonsidewalks,andthatthisincreasedpatronagewouldoffset
byafive‐to‐oneratioanylostretailsalesfromthosenotcomingdue
tothereducednumberof
parkingspaces.
WhenTorontoconsidersimplementationofabikelaneorwidersidewalks,Citystaffoften
prepareaparkingstudythatusesobservationaldatatoshowwhetherornotalltheexistingon‐
streetparkingisneeded.However,thistypeofstudyoftenfailstosatisfy
theconcernsof
businessownersorCityCouncillors–sometimesbecauseofanissuewithdatacollection(e.g.,
datawasnotcollectedonapeakbusinessdayorhour).LiketheNewYorkStudy,thisstudy
endeavourstobemorerigorousbyunderstandingbehaviourandperceptionsofboth
customersand
merchants,inadditiontoassessingparkingcapacity.
3.2 SURVEYS
Thestudywasconductedinatwo‐weekperiodfromJuly8
to19,2008,andemployedtwo
surveys:asurveyofgroundfloormerchantsalongBloorStreetbetweenSpadinaAvenueand
BathurstStreet;andasurveyofpedestrianswalkingonBloorStreetbetweenSpadinaAvenue
andBathurstStreet.SurveyorsfromtheUniversityofToronto’sDepartmentofHealthSciences
werehiredtocarry
outthesurveys.Thecompletemerchantandpedestriansurveysare
includedinappendicesAandB.
3.2.1 Merchant Survey
Incaseswherereallocatingtheparkinglanetoothertravelmodeswithintheright‐of‐wayfaces
oppositionfrommerchants,itisnotclearhowmanyofthetotalbusinessesthedissenting
merchantsactuallyrepresent.Dotheyspeakforthemajorityoraretheyrepresentingindividual
opinionsandinterests?Themerchant
15%
50%
Figure 9. Types of businesses on Bloor
Service
Store
Restaurant/
Bar
48%11%
41%
Figure 10. Types of businesses that responded to
the survey
Restaurant/
Bar
Store Service
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
123
74%
South-West corner at Major 103 19%
4
Mid-block between Robert and Sussex (south side) 50 9%
5
Mid-block between Bathurst and Albany (north side) 28 5%
6
North-West corner at Howland 74 14%
7
Mid-block between Brunswick and Dalton 72 13%
8
North-East corner at Walmer 94 18%
Total
538 100%
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 12
Surveyparticipantswereaskediftheyliveorworkinthearea;howoftentheyvisitthearea;
howmuchtheyspendinthearea;thepurposeoftheirvisit;whatformoftransportationthey
usetogettothearea;andtheirpreferenceforabikelaneorawider
sidewalk.Again,
pedestrianswerealsoaskedaboutwideningthesidewalk,asanalternativetoinstallingabike
lane,simplytounderstandwhetherornottheywereopposedtolosingon‐streetparking,
regardlessofthealternativeuseofthespace.Surveyrespondentswerealsoaskedwherethey
liveinorder
togaugehowmanyoftheBloorAnnexpatronsliveclosetoarea.Formoredetail
onthequestionscontainedinthesurvey,pleaseseeAppendixB.
ThesurveywasconductedonaTuesday,Wednesday,ThursdayorSaturday,with afairly
equaldistributionbetweenthosedays(seeTable2.Distributionof
surveyrespondentsby
surveydayoftheweek).ThestudyfocusisonpeoplewhovisittheBloorAnnexarea,andnot
thosepassingthrough,sothesurveyorsavoidedthepeakmorningandafternooncommute
theTPAnowexclusivelyemployspay‐and‐display
parkingmachinesforon‐streetparkingandinmostmunicipalparkinglots(‘GreenP’lots),the
TPAhasarobust,sophisticated,andreliablesystemfortrackingparkingusage.
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 13
TPAsuppliedJuly2008usagedataforon‐streetparkingalongBloorStreetandSpadinaRoad,
allwithinatwoorthreeminutewalkofthestudyarea.TPAalsosupplieddataforthree‘Green
P’lots,alsowithinatwoorthreeminutewalkofthestudyarea:at577
Palmerston,365
Lippincottand19Spadina.ThedatatrackspaymentsmadeusingTPA’spay‐and‐display
machinesforbothon‐streetparkingandoff‐streetTPAlots.
Foron‐streetparking,dataisreportedasthenumberofvalidticketsduring15‐minuteintervals
throughoutthedaysthatcorrespondwith
thepedestriansurveydays(July8,9,10,15,16,17
and19).However,dataforSaturday,July19
th
wasnotavailable,soSaturday,July12
th
was
substitutedinstead.Theresearcherstookhourlysnapshotsbetween10:00a.m.and9:00p.m.–
thehourswhenthemachinesaregenerallyinuse–anddeterminedtheaveragenumberof
validticketsthroughouttheday,aswellasmorning‐midday,afternoon,andeveningaverages.
Fortheoff‐streetlots,
parkingdataisreportedasdailyandeveningpeaks–thehighest
recordednumberofvalidticketsatanygiventimeinthedayoreveningperiod.Again,theTPA
supplieddataforthesamedaysastheon‐streetparkingdata,whichcorrespondtothe
pedestriansurveydays.
Theaverage
validticketcountswerecomparedtotheoverallcapacity–eitheron‐streetorin
lots–todeterminetheaverageusageofon‐streetandoff‐streetpaidparking.
Regardingthemerchantsurveydata,onlygroundfloormerchantswereapproached.This
representsthemajorityofmerchants,asmostsecondandthirdfloorunitsalongBloorStreetare
residential.Nonetheless,therearesomebusinessesthatwere
notincluded,anditispossible
thatthegroundfloorsampledoesnotaccuratelyrepresenttheothers.
Withregardtothepedestriansurvey,thequestionthatasksaboutpreferenceforabikelaneor
awidersidewalkshouldhavebeenmoredescriptive.While abikelaneinherentlysuggests
improvedconditions
forcycling,awidersidewalkdoesnotpromiseanythingotherthana
widersidewalk.Theintentoftheresearcherswastosuggestthatawidersidewalkwouldalso
providemorespaceforbenches,trees,andotheramenitiesthatwouldlikelyimprovethe
pedestrianenvironment.However,unfortunatelythisintentwasnotaccurately
conveyedinthe
surveyquestion.
Finally,regardingtheparkingdata,theTPAemploysapay‐and‐displaysystemthatcanonly
trackpaymentandnotactualusage.Soitislikelythatsomeuserspayformoretimethanthey
actuallyparktheircar,andalsothatsomeusersdo
notpayforsomeorallofthetimetheyuse.
Also,thecapacityofon‐streetparkingdependsonthesizeofcarsparked,asthereareno
designatedspaceswithinablock.So,forexample,therecouldbe10largesportutilityvehicles
or20minicompactcars
–oranycombinationthereof–parkedinthesameamountofspace.
However,theTPAhasbeenusingthisdataasitsprimarysourceforcapacityanalysissothe
researchersfeelthisisareasonabledatasettouse.Infuturestudies,itcouldbeusefulto
combinetheTPA’s
pay‐and‐displaydatawithobservationalrecordingssotoincludeany
noteworthylocalconditions,suchaspick‐up/drop‐offvehiclesthatstopforshortperiodsof
timeandcommercialdeliveriesthatdonotpayforparking
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 15
iswherethespacewouldcomefrom toaccommodateabikelaneorwider
sidewalks.Inordertoestimatetheeffect,merchantswereaskediftheythoughttherespective
changewouldbringfewercustomersormorecustomerstotheirbusiness,oriftheyexpectedno
effectivechangetotheircustomer
base.Onthequestionofinstallingabikelaneandremoving
halftheon‐streetparking,almost75%ofbusinessesthoughttheirbusinesswouldimproveor
staythesame,whileslightlymorethan25%thoughtthechangewouldbringinfewer
customers.Onthequestionofwideningthesidewalkandremoving
parking,theresultswere
almostthesame,withonly25%ofmerchantsbelievingthechangewouldhurtbusiness.The
datashowsthatmoremerchantsthinkthatbikelanesandwidersidewalkswouldincrease
businessthandecreaseit.
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 16
26%
25%
30%
35%
44%
40%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Bike lane and 50% of on-
street parking removed
Wider sidewalk and 50%
on-street parking removed
No Change
gettoBloorAnnexonfoot,followedbypublictransit,bicycleandfinallycar.Amongstthose
wholiveorworkinthearea,
two‐thirdswalk,14%cycle,another14%takepublictransit,and
only5%drive.Forthosewhodonotliveorworkinthearea,54%takepublictransit,20%walk,
16%drive,and10%cycle.
Walk
Bicycle
Public Transit
Car
67%
14%
14%
5%
Figure 13. Transportation
mode share – live or work
in the area
Walk
Bicycle
Public Transit
Car
10%
54%
16%
20%
Figure 14. Transportation
mode share – do not live
or work in the area
Walk
Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business 17
Table 4. Number of days per month visiting the Bloor Annex
Number of
days
Live or work in the
area (294)
Live and work outside
the area (244)
Walk
(246)
Bicycle
(64)
Public
Transit (171)
Car
(55)
Total
(538)
0-1
2%
30%
7% 5%
24% 29%
15%
2
1% 10% 2% 5% 9% 9% 5%
3
1% 7% 2% 5% 5% 7% 3%
thatthe
Table 5. Money spent in the area per month
Live or work in the
area (294)
Live and work outside
the area (242)
Walk
(246)
Bicycle
(64)
Public
Transit (171)
Car
(55)
Total
(536)
< $25
6% 31% 8% 11% 29% 24% 17%
$25-$99
21%
35%
16% 39%
37% 37%
27%
$100-$499 50%
29%
52% 42%
28% 30%
41%