Solution structure of the active-centre mutant I14A of the histidine-
containing phosphocarrier protein from
Staphylococcus carnosus
Andreas Mo¨ glich
1,
*, Brigitte Koch
2
, Wolfram Gronwald
1
, Wolfgang Hengstenberg
2
, Eike Brunner
1
and Hans Robert Kalbitzer
1
1
Institute of Biophysics and Physical Biochemistry, University of Regensburg, Germany;
2
SG Physiology of Microorganisms,
Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany
High-pressure NMR experiments performed on the histi-
dine-containing phosphocar rier protein (HPr) from Sta-
phylococcus carnosus have shown that residue Ile14, which is
located in t he active-centre loop, exhibits a peculiarly small
pressure response. In contrast, the rest of the loop shows
strong pre ssure effects a s i s e xpected for t ypical protein
interaction sites. To elucidate the structural role of t his
residue, the mutant protein HPr(I14A), in which Ile14 is
replaced by Ala, was produced and s tudied by solution
NMR spectroscopy. On the basis of 1406 structural
restraints including 20 directly detected hydrogen bonds, 49
(HPr); mutant protein; nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR);
protein structure.
Histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein (HPr) is a
central part of the bacterial carbohydrate/phosphoenolpyru-
vate phosphotransfer system (PTS) first described in Escheri-
chia coli [1]. The PTS catalyses the phosphorylation of a
metabolite and its concomitant transport across the plasma
membrane into the cytosol (PTS reviewed in [2,3]). During
the transport p rocess, the phosphoryl group of phos-
phoenolpyruvate is transferred first to enzyme I (EI) and
then to His15 of HPr. The phosphoryl group is transiently
bound to the N
d1
atom of the imidazole ring of His15. Via
enzymes IIA, IIB and IIC/D, the group is finally transferred
to the imported metabolite. Compared to conventional
substrate import and consecutive phosphorylation, the
import v ia the PTS is energetically favorable. From the
residue His15 of HPr, the phosphoryl group can also be
transferred t o transcription factors containing PTS regula-
tion domains (PRDs). Depending on their phosphorylation
state, these proteins control the activity of operons mainly
responsible for catabolism [3,4]. The activity of HPr from
Gram-positive bacteria is regulated by the bifunctional
enzyme HPr kinase/phosphorylase, which controls the
phosphorylation state of the HPr residue Ser46 [5]. When
phosphorylated at residue Ser46, HPr interacts with cata-
bolite control protein A (CcpA), which regulates the activity
of genes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism [6,7].
To exert its various biological functions, the HPr
(Received 28 July 2004, revised 13 October 2004,
accepted 21 October 2004)
Eur. J. Biochem. 271, 4815–4824 (2004) Ó FEBS 2004 doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04447.x
and t wo long a-helice s. K albitzer et al.[16]usedhigh-
pressure
1
Hand
15
N N MR measurements to study the ability
of HPr to adopt different conformations. In general,
dynamic regions in proteins are expected to be capable of
undergoing large conformational changes. This should
result in strong effects induced by the variation of external
conditions such as pressure. While the core region of HPr
from S. carnosus, w hich mainly consists of the b-sheet,
showed only little or m oderate variation, large pressure-
induced changes o f chemical shifts w ere observed i n the
active site region encompassing residues 12–18. In contrast to
its surrounding residues, Ile14 displayed only a s mall
pressure-induced change of chemical shift. Kalbitzer et al.
[16] suggested that this r esidue, which is not strictly conserved
between different species, serves as an anchoring point for the
active site loop. The isoleucine side chain would stabilize the
loop but still allow it to adopt the different conformations
necessary for the interaction with diverse proteins andligands.
To evaluate this hypothesis, a mutant form of HPr from
S. carnosus was produced in which the isoleucine at position
14 is replaced by an alanine residue, referred to as
HPr(I14A). In this paper we report the solution structure
of this protein as determined by NMR spectroscopy.
pepstatin, 1 l
M
leupeptin, 0.1 l
M
bovine
pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and, as an internal reference,
0.1 m
M
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentanesulfonic acid. The pH
was adjusted to 7.14 by addition of KOH. The fi nal protein
concentrationwasbetween1.4and1.7m
M
depending on
the NMR experiment. For the determination of residual
dipolar couplings (RDCs), partial molecular orientation of
the HPr sample was obtained by the addition of 7.5% or
4.0% (w/v) of the bicelle forming lipid mixture 1,2-di-O-
dodecyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DIODPC)/3-(cho-
lamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio 2-hydroxyl-1-propane
sulfonate (CHAPSO) at a 4.3 : 1 ratio [19].
NMR spectroscopy
NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker (Karlsruhe, Ger-
many) DMX-500, DMX-600 and DMX-800 spectromete rs
with
1
H resonance frequencies of 500, 600 and 800 MHz,
respectively. All measurements were carried out at a
temperature of 2 98 K. Time-domain NMR data were
processed using the
XWINNMR
glich, D. Weinfurtner, T. Maurer, W. Gronwald, H. R.
Kalbitzer, unpublished data). From this structure and the
assigned resonance frequencies, 2D NOESY spectra were
calculated using the computer program
RELAX
[20]. These
calculated spectra w ere c ompared with the experimental
data. The
1
H chemical shifts were referenced relative to 2,2-
dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonic acid.
15
Nand
13
Creso-
nances were referenced indirectly [21]. Spectral visualization
and volume i ntegration of NOE signals was carried out
using the computer program
AUREMOL
[22].
Determination of dihedral angles and hydrogen bonds
Three-bond coupling c onstants between H
N
and H
d
atoms,
3
J
HN-Ha
, were measured by MOCCA-SIAM experiments
the difference between the coupling constants observed in
isotropic and anisotropic solution. Using the computer
programs
SVD
[34],
DIPOCOUP
[35] and
PALES
[36], the
molecular alignment tensor could be determined from the
measured residual dipolar couplings and a structure model
that was calculated from all experimental restraints except
for the residual dipolar couplings. The eigenvalues of the
tensor were found to be S
zz
¼ 0.000491, S
yy
¼ )0.000313,
S
xx
¼ )0.000178. From the experimental residual dipolar
couplings and the alignment tensor, the quality factor Q can
be calculated [37]. A value of 0.2880 was obtained, indicating
good agreement between the RDCs and the other structural
restraints derived from NMR experiments.
MOCCA-SIAM experiments in isotropic and anisotropic
solution were used to measure residual dipolar couplings for
the
1
H
CNS
[38,39]. A total
number of 1406 non redundant structural restraints derived
from NMR experiments were used in the calculations
(Table 1). This corresponds to a ratio of about 16 restraints
per residue. Approximate distances between
1
Hatomswere
derived from NOE cross-peak intensities in two- and three-
dimensional spectra. The standard simulated a nnealing
protocol supplied with
CNS
was modified to allow two
different classes of residual dipolar couplings to be used as
restraints. Apart from this, all oth er p arameters correspon-
ded to the standard values. Of 300 calculated structures, the
ensemble of the 10 structures with the lowest pseudoenergies
was further refined in explicit solvent [40,41]. To facilitate
comparison with the wild-type HPr from S. carnosus its
structure was recalculated employing exactly the same
protocol as for the mutant protein. Mean structures of the
mutant and wild-type HPr proteins were calculated with the
computer program
MOLMOL
[42] by fitting the positions of
the backbone atoms C
a
,C¢ andN.Structuralimageswere
prepared with the computer program
MOLMOL
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w
2
ðd
a
H
À d
b
H
Þ
2
þðd
a
N
À d
b
N
Þ
2
q
ð1Þ
Here, w denotes a weight factor that accounts for the
different s ensitivities of the c hemical s hifts of the amide
proton and the amide nitrogen towards structural changes
and xenon, respectively. Following Gro
¨
ger et al .[43],w was
computed as the ratio of the s tandard deviations of the
chemical shifts of the amide nitrogen and p roton nuclei.
Results
NOE contacts 1268
Intraresidual (i, i) 637
Short and intermediate
distance (i, i + j; 1 £ j £ 4)
365
Long distance (i, i + j; j ‡ 5) 266
F dihedral angles from
3
J couplings
(MOCCA-SIAM)
44
Hydrogen bonds from H(N)CO experiment 20
RDCs 74
1
H
N
-
15
N RDC from
IPAP/HSQC experiments
49
1
H
N
-
1
H
a
RDC from
MOCCA-SIAM experiments
Core region (residues 2–9, 16–27, 32–37,
40–43, 47–53, 59–84), heavy atoms
0.102
All residues, backbone atoms C
a
,C¢, N 0.084
All residues, heavy atoms 0.121
Ramachandran plot
(except glycine and proline residues) Incidence
Most favored regions 83.7%
Additional allowed regions 13.5%
Generously allowed regions 1.7%
Disallowed regions 1.1%
Energies of the 10 selected
structures after refinement in water E/kJÆmol
)1
E
total
)13534 ± 306
E
NOE
137 ± 11
Ó FEBS 2004 Solution structure of the I14A mutant of HPr (Eur. J. Biochem. 271) 4817
the structure calculation of H Pr(I14A) is given in Table 1.
Interatomic distance restraints have been derived from
homonuclear and
13
C-resolved NOESY spectra. Structural
restraints for the backbone dihedral angle F were calculated
from three bond J-couplings between H
structure ( Fig. 1). Residues in a-helices mainly display
positive
1
H
N
-
15
N RDCs while those located in b-sheets
usually show negative values. This observation can be
accounted for by the orientation of the principal axis system
of the molecular alignment tensor in the HPr molecule
(Fig. 2). The z-axis, which denotes the direction o f largest
partial molecular orientation, is arranged almost parallel to
the a-helices and the b-sheet of the protein. As the
1
H
N
-
15
N
bond vectors in the a-helices are therefore almost parallel to
the z-axis, their size is mainly determined by the positive
eigenvalue S
zz
of the tensor [31]. In contrast, the
1
H
N
-
15
,C¢, N) located in the core region of the
molecule comprising th e canonical secondary structure
elements, RMSD values of 0.102 nm and 0.066 nm were
obtained, respectively (Table 1). Larger variations can be
seen in the region of the loops L1 con necting strand A with
helix a, and L5 joining helix b with strand D. HPr(I14A)
shows the open-faced b-sandwich fold which was also
observed for the wild-type protein and other HPr molecules.
The analysis of the 10 lowest energy structures with the
Fig. 1. Dependen ce of
1
H
N
-
15
N residual dipolar couplings on secondary
structure. Thesizeofthe
1
H
N
-
15
N residual dipolar couplings is strongly
correlated with secondary structure. A prediction of sec ondary struc-
ture elements by the program
CSI
[44] based upon the chemical shift
values of the H
a
,C
b-sheet and the a-helices. The eigenvalues of the tensor are S
zz
¼
0.000491, S
yy
¼ )0.000313, S
xx
¼ )0.000178.
4818 A. Mo
¨
glich et al.(Eur. J. Biochem. 271) Ó FEBS 2004
program
PROCHECK
-
NMR
[46] recognizes a central antipar-
allel b-sheet consisting of strands A (residues 2–7), B
(31–37), C (40–43) and D (60–67), two relatively long
a-helices a (16–27) and c (70–83), as well as the short a-he lix
b (47–50). The analysis of chemical shifts [44] predicts
essentially the same secondary structure elements at slightly
different positions (b-strands: strand A, 1–9; strand B,
32–36; strand C, 39–42; strand D, 59–66; a-helices: helix a,
12–26; helix b, 47–51; helix c, 69–82). The active site of the
HPr molecule containing the residue His15 is formed by
loop L1.
Recalculation of the 3D-structure of wild-type HPr
and comparison with the mutant protein
It is known that the NMR structures obtained from a given
set of experimental restraints also depend on the programs
Significant deviations between t he two proteins are seen
in the active site region where the mutation has been
introduced. The replacement of I le14 by Ala causes a slight
longitudinal compression of the mutant protein (Fig. 4). At
its N-terminal end, helix a displays a kink towards the
interior of the protein. The space that in the wild-type
molecule is occupied by the large hydrophobic side chain of
Fig. 3. Structure ensemble of HPr(I14A). The average structure of the
10 lowest- energy structures out of 300 calculated with
CNS
is shown.
TheradiusofthesplinereflectstheRMSDvaluesoftheC
a
atom
positions. Th e s cale bar indicates a length of 0.2 nm correspo nding to a
RMSD value of 0.1 nm. Residues are colour-coded according to the
number of restraints used in the stru cture calculations for this amino
acid. Light grey indicates 10 or fewer, yellow 11–20, orange 21–40, red
more than 40 restraints per residue.
Table 2. Structural statistics of wild-type HPr. The structures were
recalculated from the data from Go
¨
rler et al. [15] with the same pro-
tocol used for the mutant. The NMR data have been recorded at
298 K and pH 7.14. In total 1301 NOE, 78 dihedral angle, and 39
hydrogen bond restraints were used. The quality of the 10 lowest
energy structures was assessed using
PROCHECK
-
NMR
total
) 11752 ± 456
E
NOE
485 ± 21.3
Ó FEBS 2004 Solution structure of the I14A mutant of HPr (Eur. J. Biochem. 271) 4819
the isoleucine residue is instead partly filled by the backbone
and s ide chain atoms of Ala19. In addition, the C-terminus
folds back onto the core of the protein thereby allowing the
side chain of Leu86 to partly fill the hole created by the
removal of Ile14. Due to these changes other alterations are
induced in the HPr(I14A) molecule. The catalytically active
residue His15 is moved closer to the p rotein interior and its
orientation relative to the protein core is changed. The loops
L1 and L5 show a significantly different conformation.
Helix b is distorted at its C-terminal end and the loop L4 at
its N-terminal end is bent into another d irection than in the
wild-type protein. To allow the hydrophobic side chain of
Leu86 to project into the protein core, the orientation of
helix c is slightly changed in the mutant form. These
changes observed in the mutant protein are also supported
by other NMR parameters. For example, NOE contacts
between the side chain protons of Leu86 and protons of
amino acids Ala14, Val55 and Leu81 are observed, none of
which are seen for the wild-type protein. Analysis of the
backbone dihedral angles F and Y of mutant and wild-type
protein also s upports the observed structural differences
(Fig. 5 ). Significant changes in dihedral angles between the
two proteins were observed for almost all regions of the
molecules. In Fig. 5 the residues for which the difference in
N-HSQC spectra were recorded
for wild-type and mutant HPr. Following Gro
¨
ger et al.
[43], combined chemical shift changes were calculated for
the amide groups according to Eqn (1). The changes
induced by the mutation of the wild-type protein were
compared with the combined chemical s hift changes
observed in the I14A m utant upon xenon-binding
(Fig. 7). While on average the total cha nges in chemical
shifts due to the introduction of the mutation are about
four times as large as those i nduced by xenon-binding,
they show a similar dependence on the amino acid
sequence. Note that not only the magnitudes of the
individual shift changes but also that their signs closely
correspond. Thus, for most residues the chemical shift
changes caused by the mutation were at least partly
compensated by the binding of xenon.
Discussion
Structural basis of the strongly reduced pressure
response at position 14 in HPr
During the phosphoryl group transfer from enzyme EI to
enzyme EII or other proteins, the active centre loop L1 of
wild-type HPr has to adapt to different functional states.
High-pressure NMR spectroscopy studies have revealed
that protein regions, which are able to exist in different
conformational (sub)states, often show large, n onlinear
pressure reponses [47]. In agreement with these findings such
a pressure response was also experimentally observed for
loop L1 of wild-type HPr [16]. The sole exception was
(Figs 4 and 5). Particularly the relative position of the
catalytically active histidine i s clearly different an d less
accessible to the solvent c ompared to the wild-type protein.
These structural changes should also have a profound effect
on the biological activity of H Pr(I14A). In agreement with
this assumption we have found a much reduced phospho-
transferase activity of the mutant compared to the wild-type
protein in the standard complementation a ssay [48].
Reversal of the mutation-induced changes
by xenon-binding
One might reasonably assume that the removal of the bulky
sidechain of an isoleucine residue via mutation to alanine
simply leads to t he creation of a h ydrophobic c avity of
corresponding size and shape. Our structural studies
clearly show that this is not the case f or the mutant
HPr(I14A). Although the general fold of t he protein is
conserved, the overall conformation is changed leading to
distinctly different structures for wild-type a nd mutant
HPr with a RMSD of 0.155 nm for the backbone atoms
(C
a
,C¢, N). The replacement of t he large hydrophobic
side chain of isoleucine with the much smaller one of
alanine causes a collapse of the protein in that region. The
resulting hydrophobic cavity is partly filled by side chain s
of other hydrophobic residues. Helix a bends towards the
protein interior to partially fill the void left by the removal
of the isoleucine. Moreover, Leu86 undergoes a pro-
nounced rearrangement of its side chain which also
protrudes into t he space o ccupied by I le14 in the wild-
shifts Dd
tot
/<Dd
tot
> of the amide groups are plotted as a function of
their position in the sequ ence. T he comb ined ch emical sh ift cha nges
Dd
tot
have been calculated according to Eqn (1). <Dd
tot
> represents
the average value of the corresponding chemical shift values and is
indicated by the broken line. Chemical shift changes were determined
in
1
H-
15
N-HSQC spectra for t he wild-type protein and the mutant
protein both in the absence and the p resence of xenon [43]. Xenon-
induced chemical shift changes in HPr(I14A) (blue); chemical shift
changes induced by the mutation in the absence of xenon (red).
4822 A. Mo
¨
glich et al.(Eur. J. Biochem. 271) Ó FEBS 2004
shifts between wild-type and mutant protein (Fig. 7). As
detailed above the removal of the hydrophob ic sidechain of
isoleucine effects profound structural rearrangements in
HPr(I14A). Apart from two regions in the direct vicinity
of the mutation site, strong structural differences are also
observed for the C-terminus, most notably for Leu86.
equilibrium between different protein conformations [53].
In this way, it is possible to populate species only present to a
small extent at atmospheric pressure. NMR spectroscopy is
a convenient technique to monitor such changes with atomic
resolution. Both structurally flexible residues, which m ight
mediate the interaction with different ligands, and residues
that stabilize the protein can be identified by this method. It
would be interesting to see the influence of the mutation
upon the pressure response of HPr. Currently, work is in
progress to address this question. The data also show that
with its affinity to hydrophobic cavities xenon can influence
conformational e quilibria a nd thus can possibly restore
function by stabilizing the active conformation of a protein.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr Mich ael Wenzler, Dr Rolf Do
¨
ker, Jochen
Trenner and Dr Bernhard Ganslmeier for helpful discussions, and
Christian Gro
¨
ger for recording
1
H-
15
N-HSQC sp ectra. F inancial
support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Br 1278/9–1, SFB
521 projects A6, C6), the Fonds der chemischen Industrie and the EU
(FP6, SPIN E-consortium) is gratefully ac knowledged. Thanks are
further due to Ms Ingrid Cuno for carefully proofreading the
manuscript.
glycolytic activity to carbon catabolite repression in Gram-positive
bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 15, 1049–1053.
8. Kalbitzer, H.R. & H engstenberg, W. (1993) The solution structure
of the histidine-containing protein (HPr) from Staphylococcus
aureus as determined by two-dime nsional 1H-NMR s pectrosc opy.
Eur. J. Biochem. 21 6 , 205–214.
9. van Nuland, N.A., H angyi, I.W., van Schaik, R.C., Bere ndsen,
H.J., van Gunsteren, W.F., Scheek, R.M. & Robillard, G.T.
(1994) The high-resolution structure of the histidine -containing
phosphocarrier protein HPr from E scherich ia coli determined by
restrained molecular dynamics from nuclear magnetic resonance
nuclear Overhauser effect data. J. Mol. Biol. 237, 544–559.
10. Hahmann, M., Maurer, T., Lorenz, M., Hengstenberg, W.,
Glaser, S. & Kalbitzer, H.R. (1998) Structural studies of histidine-
containing phosphocarrier prote in from Enterococcus faecalis.
Eur. J. Biochem. 25 2 , 51–58.
11. Maurer, T ., Do
¨
ker, R., Go
¨
rler, A., Hengstenberg, W. & Kalbitzer,
H.R. (2001) Th ree-dime nsional structure of th e histidine-con-
taining phosphocarrier protein (HPr) from Enterococcus faecalis
in solution. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 635–644.
12. Maurer, T., Meier, S., Kachel, N. , Munte, C.E., Hasenbein, S.,
Koch, B., Hengste nberg, W. & Kalbitzer, H.R. (2004) High
Resolution Structure of the Histidine Containing Phosphocarrier
Protein (HPr) from Staphylococcus aureus and Cha ract erisatio n of
its Interaction with the bifunctional HprKinase/Phosphorylase.
J. Bacteriol. 186, 5906–5918.
ptsH gene, biochemical characterization and NMR studies of the
mutant proteins. Protein Eng. 6, 417–423.
19. Cavagnero, S., Dyson, J .H. & Wright, P.E. (1999) Improved low
pH bicelle system for orienting macromolecules over a wide tem-
perature range. J. Biomol. NMR 13, 387–391.
20. Go
¨
rler, A. & Kalbitzer, H.R. (1997) Relax, a flexible program for
the b ack calculation o f NOESY spectra based on complete-
relaxation-matrix formalism. J. Magn. Reson. 124, 177–188.
21. Wishart, D.S., Bigam, C.G., Yao, J., Abildgaard, F., Dyson, H.J.,
Oldfield, E., Markley, J.L. & Sykes, B.D. (1995) 1H, 13C and 15N
chemical sh ift re ferencin g in bio molecu lar NM R. J. Biomol. NMR
6, 135–140.
22. Gron wald, W. & Kalbitzer, H.R. (2004) Automated structure
determin at io n of proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Prog. NMR
Spectrosc. 44, 33–96.
23. Prasch, T., Gro
¨
schke, P. & Glaser, S.J. (1998) SIAM, a novel
NMR experiment for the determination of homonuclear coupling
constants. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 802–806.
24. Mo
¨
glich,A.,Wenzler,M.,Kramer,F.,Glaser,S.J.&Brunner,E.
(2002) Determination o f residual dipolar couplings in homo-
nuclear MOCCA-SIAM experiments. J. Biomol. NMR 23, 211–
219.
25.Titman,J.&Keeler,J.(1990)Measurementofhomonuclear
coupling constants f rom NMR c orrelation spectra. J. Magn.
J. Magn. Reson. 131, 373–378.
34. Losconzi, J.A., Andrec, M., Fischer, M.W.F. & Prestegard, J.H.
(1999)Ordermatrixanalysisofresidual dipolar couplings using
singular value decomposition. J. Magn. Reson. 138, 334–342.
35. Meiler, J., Peti, W. & Griesinger, C. (2000) DipoCoup: a versatile
program for 3D-structure homology comparison based on
residual dipolar couplings and pseudocontact shifts. J. Biomol.
NMR 17, 283–294.
36. Zweckstetter, M. & Bax, A. (2000) Prediction of sterically induced
alignment in a dilute liquid crystalline phase: aid to protein
structure determination by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 3791–
3792.
37. Cornilescu,G.,Marquardt,J.L.,Ottiger,M.&Bax,A.(1998)
Validation of Protein Structure from Anisotropic Carbonyl Che-
mical Shifts in a Dilute Liquid Crystalline Phase. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 120, 6836–6837.
38. Nilges, M., Gronenborn, A.M., Bru
¨
nger, A.T. & Clore, G.M.
(1988) Determ ination of three-dimensional structures o f proteins
by simulated annealing with interproton distance restraints.
Application to crambin, potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor and
barley serine proteinase inhibitor 2. Prot. Eng. 2, 27–38.
39. Bru
¨
nger, A.T., Adams, P.D., Clore, G.M., Delano, W.L., Gros,
P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Jiang, J.S., Kuszweski, J., Nilges, M.,
Pannu, N.S., Read, R.J., Rice, L.M., S imonson, T. & Warren,
G.L. (1998) Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite
for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Cryst. D 54,
R. & Thornton, J.M. (1996) AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR:
programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by
NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8, 477–486.
47. Akasaka, K. (2003) Highly fluctuating protein structures revealed
by variable-pressure nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochemistry 42,
10875–10885.
48. Hengstenberg, W., Penberthy, W.K., Hill, K.L. & Morse, M.L.
(1969) Phosp hotransferase system of Staphylococcus aureus:its
requirement for the ac cumulatio n and metabolism of galacto sid es.
J. Bacteriol. 99, 383–388.
49. Schoenborn, B.P., Watson, H.C. & Kendrew, J.C. (1965) Binding
of xenon to sperm whale myoglobin. Nature 207, 28–30.
50. Montet, Y., Amara, P., Volbeda, A ., Verneda, X., Hatchikian,
E.C. & Field, M.J. (1997) Gas a ccess to the active site of Ni-Fe
hydrogenases probed by X-ray crystallography and molecular
dynamics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 523–526.
51. Prange
´
, T., Schiltz, M., Pernot, L., Colloc’h, N., Longhi, S.,
Bourguet, W. & Fourme, R. (1998) E xploring hydrophobic sites in
proteins with xenon or krypton. Proteins 30, 61–73.
52. Rubin,S.M.,Lee,S Y.,Ruiz,E.J.,Pines,A.&Wemmer,D.
(2002) D etection and characterization of xenon-binding s ites
in proteins by
129
Xe NMR sSpectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 425–
440.
53. Akasaka, K. & Yamada, H. (2001) On-line cell high-pressure
nuclear magnetic resonance t echnique: a pp lication to protein
studies. Methods Enzymol. 338, 134–158.